Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis finds higher peripheral Galectin-3 levels in cognitive impairment

Meta-analysis finds higher peripheral Galectin-3 levels in cognitive impairment
Photo by National Cancer Institute / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Interpret elevated Gal-3 levels as associated with cognitive impairment, but not causative.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated peripheral Galectin-3 (Gal-3) levels in patients with cognitive impairment (CI) compared with healthy controls. The analysis included 877 patients with CI and 715 healthy controls from multiple studies.

The primary outcome was peripheral Gal-3 levels. The meta-analysis found that Gal-3 levels were significantly higher in the CI group compared with controls, with a weighted mean difference (WMD) of 0.85 (95% CI 0.42-1.28). This suggests a potential association between elevated Gal-3 and cognitive impairment.

The authors did not report specific limitations, funding sources, or conflicts of interest. The analysis is observational in nature, and the results should be interpreted cautiously. No data on adverse events, follow-up duration, or clinical outcomes were provided.

Clinically, these findings highlight Gal-3 as a potential biomarker of interest in cognitive impairment, but further prospective studies are needed to determine its diagnostic or prognostic utility. The evidence does not support any therapeutic or screening recommendations at this time.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundCognitive Impairment (CI) is an increasingly serious public health problem in an aging society. Its rising incidence rate is closely linked to functional decline and increased mortality risk. Because of its insidious onset and irreversible progression, early identification is particularly crucial. Neuroinflammation and vascular injury play important roles in the occurrence and development of CI. Galectin-3 (Gal-3), as a biomarker involved in the inflammatory response and vascular lesion process, may have potential value in the early prediction and risk assessment of CI.MethodsThis study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. Seven databases were systematically retrieved from their establishment until March 8, 2026. Two independent researchers conducted literature screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The combined effect size was calculated using the weighted mean difference (WMD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), with a 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was evaluated using the chi-square (χ2) test (Cochran’s Q) and the inconsistencies index test (I2), and publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s regression tests.ResultsThis systematic review included nine studies comprising 877 patients with cognitive impairment (CI) and 715 healthy controls. The meta-analysis demonstrated that peripheral Gal-3 levels were significantly higher in the CI group compared with controls (WMD: 0.85; 95%CI: 0.42–1.28; p 
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.