Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Explainable AI methods may address black-box limitations in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases

Explainable AI methods may address black-box limitations in clinical microbiology and infectious dis…
Photo by Aerps.com / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider AI's black-box limitation when evaluating its clinical microbiology applications.

This narrative review discusses advancements in Explainable AI (XAI) methods for clinical applications in microbiology, infectious diseases, and public health. The review does not report specific study designs, populations, sample sizes, or clinical settings. It focuses on the conceptual challenge of AI opacity in clinical integration.

No specific interventions, comparators, or clinical outcomes are reported. The review identifies the 'black-box' aspect of AI as a key barrier to clinical adoption. No numerical data, safety information, or tolerability findings are presented.

Key limitations include the narrative review format, which may not systematically assess evidence. No funding sources or conflicts of interest are reported. The practice relevance is not specified, and the review provides conceptual discussion rather than clinical validation of XAI methods.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Antimicrobial resistance and emerging infectious diseases remain significant challenges for global health, driving a need for advanced technological solutions. Artificial Intelligence (AI) expanded opportunities in clinical microbiology, infectious diseases, and public health by harnessing vast, structured datasets. Despite impressive analytical capabilities, the clinical integration of AI-based applications is hindered by its opacity. The “black-box” aspect undermines adoption into healthcare workflows. Explainable AI (XAI) methods, including intrinsically interpretable models and post-hoc interpretability tools, such as SHAP, LIME, and Grad-CAM, can address these transparency challenges. This narrative review is intended to be a primer for the interested clinician. It systematically evaluates recent advancements in XAI in the context of clinical applications for clinical microbiology, infectious diseases, and public health. We further discuss the ethical and regulatory landscape shaping AI adoption, including the critical role of open, quality-controlled data, robust performance metrics, and clear interpretability to ensure safe and effective clinical implementation. Lastly, we propose future directions, emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration, international data-sharing initiatives, and tailored AI literacy training to facilitate trustworthy, equitable, and impactful use of AI in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.