Researchers reviewed 32 existing studies to see if nurse-led care helps adults who have had a stroke. They looked at how this type of care affected treatment speed, recovery, and survival. The review found that when nurses led the care, patients received time-sensitive clot-busting medication faster. Patients also showed better scores on tests of brain function and daily living abilities after their stroke. However, the review did not find a clear link between nurse-led care and whether patients lived or died. The main reason to be careful is that this was a review of many different studies, not a single new experiment. The studies varied in how they were set up and what they compared the nurse-led care to. Readers should understand that this research supports the value of specialized nursing in stroke teams. It realistically suggests that well-organized nurse-led protocols can help get treatment started quicker and may support better recovery, but its effect on saving lives remains unclear from this analysis.
Nurse-led interventions reduce door-to-needle time and improve function in adult stroke patientsNurse-led care linked to faster stroke treatment and better recovery in review
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work
A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence from 32 studies involving adult stroke patients (≥18 years) to assess the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions in stroke management. The specific comparator was not reported. The interventions were associated with a significant reduction in door-to-needle time (standardized mean difference: -1.87, 95% CI: -2.91 to -0.82). Neurological function, measured by the NIHSS, showed a pooled weighted mean difference of -0.81 (95% CI: -1.36 to -0.25), indicating improvement. Functional recovery, assessed via the modified Rankin Scale and Barthel index, also demonstrated significant improvements. The pooled odds ratio for mortality was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.44-1.32), which was not statistically significant. Safety and tolerability data, including adverse events and discontinuations, were not reported in the meta-analysis. Key limitations include the lack of a defined comparator group, the absence of reported absolute numbers for outcomes, and the observational nature of the included studies, which precludes causal inference. The findings, while supportive of integrating specialized nursing protocols into stroke care pathways, should be interpreted with caution due to these methodological constraints and the non-significant mortality outcome.