Bilateral training shows greater motor recovery than conventional therapy in subacute stroke patients
This randomized controlled trial enrolled 40 hemiplegic patients with subacute stroke to compare two rehabilitation approaches over 6 weeks. Group A received conventional task-oriented physiotherapy for the affected side only, while Group B received comprehensive bilateral training that added a strengthening regimen for the unaffected side based on FITT principles. Both groups trained 5 days per week.
Both interventions showed significant improvement in motor recovery measures. For the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Lower Extremity, Group A had a mean total score change of 7.15 ± 1.84, while Group B showed 8.45 ± 2.19. Both groups demonstrated significant within-group improvement (p < 0.05), though between-group p-values for FMA were not reported. For Brunnstrom stage of recovery, Group A improved by 1.50 ± 0.65 stages, while Group B improved by 2.70 ± 0.68 stages, with a significant between-group difference (p = 0.0001).
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include the small sample size of 40 patients, absence of confidence intervals or standardized effect sizes for between-group FMA comparisons, and only immediate post-intervention assessment without long-term follow-up. The study was published as an abstract, limiting methodological detail. While the bilateral approach showed promising results in this preliminary trial, particularly for Brunnstrom stage improvement, clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously given the study's limitations and await more robust evidence.