Meta-analysis finds non-linear exercise dose-response for mobility in stroke patients aged 45+
This Bayesian dose-response meta-analysis synthesized data from 25 randomized controlled trials involving 788 middle-aged and older adults (aged ≥45 years) with stroke. The analysis examined the association between exercise dose (measured in MET·min/week) and improvement in lower-limb functional mobility assessed via the Timed Up and Go test across various exercise modalities including gait training, motor control training, resistance training, integrated aerobic training, combined cognitive-exercise training, and virtual reality training.
The analysis revealed a non-linear association between overall exercise dose and mobility improvement, with peak effect (standardized mean difference ≈0.45) occurring at approximately 1400 MET·min/week. However, optimal dose zones varied substantially by exercise modality: resistance and gait training showed strong effects at lower doses (~560 MET·min/week), motor control training achieved significant effects at moderate doses (~890 MET·min/week, SMD ~0.50), while integrated aerobic and combined cognitive-exercise training peaked at higher doses (~1700-1800 MET·min/week). Virtual reality training exhibited wide credible intervals and non-significant effects.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported in the aggregated analysis. Key limitations include the Bayesian modeling approach, which relies on aggregated trial data rather than individual patient data, and the inability to establish causality from this meta-analytic design. The evidence for virtual reality training remains inconclusive due to wide credible intervals. While this analysis provides quantitative guidance for dose-informed exercise prescriptions in neurorehabilitation, clinicians should interpret the optimal dose zones cautiously and consider individual patient factors when implementing these findings.