Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Vertebral artery ostial stenting shows 15.8% in-stent restenosis rate in retrospective cohort

Vertebral artery ostial stenting shows 15.8% in-stent restenosis rate in retrospective cohort
Photo by Paris Bilal / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note high restenosis and recurrence rates after vertebral artery ostial stenting and re-treatment in retrospective data.

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 564 vertebral artery ostial stenting procedures in 525 patients at a single center. The primary outcome was the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISRS) >50% and the safety and effectiveness of endovascular re-interventions, which included balloon angioplasty with drug-coated balloons or re-stenting with drug-eluting balloon-mounted stents. No comparator group was reported.

The incidence of ISRS >50% after initial stenting was 15.8% (89 stents out of 564 procedures). The majority of these cases (70 out of 89) were diagnosed within the first year, with a median time of 7 months. Among 88 cases that underwent re-treatment for recurrent ISRS, the recurrence rate after re-treatment was 21.6% (19 stents). Tobacco use and dyslipidemia were significantly associated with both ISRS development and recurrence, though no causation was established.

Regarding safety, no periprocedural strokes were observed. Adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported. Key limitations include the single-center, retrospective design and the lack of randomization or a control group. The mean follow-up was 56 months after initial stenting and 23.2 months after re-treatment. Practice relevance is restrained; while re-treatment appears safe in this cohort, the high recurrence rates and observational nature of the data suggest careful patient selection and emphasis on risk factor management, such as smoking cessation, are warranted.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionIn-stent restenosis (ISRS) is a major concern following vertebral artery (VA) ostial stenting, potentially leading to recurrent symptoms or ischemic strokes. Despite the growing use of endovascular treatment for VA ostial stenosis (VAOS), data on efficacy and safety of the endovascular re-treatment for ISRS is sparse.Aim of studyTo evaluate the incidence of ISRS after VA ostial stenting and assess the safety and effectiveness of endovascular re-interventions.MethodsThis single-center retrospective analysis included patients who underwent re-treatment for ISRS >50% using either balloon angioplasty with a drug-coated balloon (DCB), or re-stenting with drug-eluting balloon-mounted stents (DES). The angiographic follow-up was performed in all cases following re-treatment. Periprocedural neurological events, need for re-treatment, and follow-up outcomes were systematically evaluated.ResultsOver a mean follow-up period of 56 months (range: 9–183 months) after 564 stenting procedures for VAOS in 525 patients, ISRS >50% was found in 89 stents (15.8%), with the majority (70 out of 89) diagnosed within the first year, at a median time of 7 months (range: 1–147 months). Re-treatment was performed in 88 cases, with DES used in 43.2% and DCB in 56.8%. No periprocedural strokes were observed. Recurrent ISRS was detected in 19 stents (21.6%) at a mean of 23.2 months (range: 4–117 months) following re-treatment. Tobacco use and dyslipidemia were significantly associated with the development of ISRS and its recurrence.ConclusionThe observed ISRS rate underscores the importance of rigorous follow-up after VA ostial stenting. Endovascular re-treatment of high-grade ISRS with DES or DCB appears to be safe and effective, while risk factor management, including smoking cessation, may further reduce recurrence rates.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.