Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

CGRP-targeted therapies provide clinically meaningful improvements in vertigo frequency and patient-reported quality of lifeNew CGRP therapies show promise for vestibular migraine relief

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider CGRP-targeted therapies for patients with persistent or refractory vestibular migraine symptoms.

This systematic review synthesizes evidence regarding the efficacy of conventional pharmacological treatments compared with CGRP-targeted therapies (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, rimegepant, and ubrogepant) for patients with definite or probable vestibular migraine. The review included data from over 12,000 patients, including a large pediatric multicenter study.

Findings indicate that both conventional preventive therapies and CGRP-targeted therapies are associated with improvements in vertigo frequency, headache burden, and dizziness-related disability. Specifically, CGRP-targeted therapies were associated with clinically meaningful improvements in vertigo frequency, monthly dizziness days, disability scores, headache outcomes, and patient-reported quality of life.

Limitations of the current evidence include a lack of randomized evidence and a scarcity of direct head-to-head comparisons between CGRP-targeted and conventional therapies. Because of these limitations, firm conclusions regarding the comparative effectiveness of these treatment modalities cannot be made. CGRP-targeted therapies may represent a promising option for patients with persistent or refractory symptoms.

How this fits prior evidence

This systematic review addresses a gap in the management of vestibular migraine by evaluating CGRP-targeted therapies. While prior evidence identifies the cerebellum as a modulatory component of migraine networks and highlights the role of microglia and astrocyte crosstalk in central sensitization, this review focuses on pharmacological outcomes. It provides a basis for managing patients who may not respond to standard protocols, though it does not provide a direct comparison to the 30% of pediatric patients with migraine who report at least one adverse event during pharmacological prophylaxis.

Living with vestibular migraine can feel like a constant battle against dizziness and persistent headaches. For many, finding a treatment that actually reduces the number of dizzy days and improves daily life is the ultimate goal. Recent research looked at how these patients respond to different types of medications.

The review looked at data from over 12,000 people, including many middle-aged women and a group of children. It compared traditional preventive treatments with newer CGRP-targeted therapies, such as erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, rimegepant, and ubrogepant. Both types of treatment were shown to reduce vertigo frequency and headache burden.

While both options show promise, the newer CGRP-targeted drugs specifically showed clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life and dizziness-related disability. Because there are very few head-to-head studies comparing these two types of drugs directly, it is hard to say which one is better. These newer options are especially interesting for people whose symptoms do not improve with standard treatments.

What this means for you:
CGRP-targeted therapies show significant improvements in dizziness and quality of life for vestibular migraine patients.

Common questions

What are CGRP-targeted therapies?

CGRP-targeted therapies include medications like erenumumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, rimegepant, and ubrogepant. These drugs are designed to target a specific protein involved in migraine. The study found these treatments led to meaningful improvements in vertigo frequency, monthly dizziness days, and overall quality of life for patients with vestibular migraine.

How do these new treatments compare to standard medications?

Both conventional treatments and CGRP-targeted therapies were shown to reduce vertigo frequency and headache burden. However, because there is a lack of direct head-to-head comparisons in the current data, researchers cannot yet say which one is more effective. These newer options are especially promising for patients with persistent symptoms.

Who can benefit from these new treatments?

These treatments are relevant for people with confirmed or probable vestibular migraine. The data included a large group of over 12,000 people, primarily middle-aged women, as well as a pediatric group. They are especially promising for those whose symptoms do not respond well to standard medications.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundVestibular migraine (VM) is a common cause of recurrent episodic vertigo, and it is associated with significant disability from recurrent vestibular and migraine symptoms. While there are a number of standard preventive treatments, their effectiveness is quite variable, and new treatments which target calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) have been identified as potential treatments. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the state of the art in the diagnosis of vestibular migraine and to compare the efficacy of conventional pharmacological treatments with the new CGRP-targeted treatments.MethodsA systematic literature review was performed to find studies that assessed the diagnosis and pharmacological treatment of vestibular migraine. Randomized controlled trials, observational studies, comparative studies, retrospective analysis, cross-sectional studies, and case reports of patients with definite or probable vestibular migraine were included. Study characteristics, diagnostic methods, therapeutic interventions, clinical outcomes, and treatment efficacy were qualitatively extracted and synthesized.Results21 studies were included with a total of over 12,000 participants. The evidence comprised predominantly adult VM populations together with one large pediatric multicenter study. Among adult studies, participants were predominantly middle-aged women. The Bárány Society/ICHD criteria were used as a primary basis for the diagnostic evaluation, with selective tests of the vestibular system and neuroimaging to rule out alternative diagnoses. conventional preventive therapies were associated with reductions in vertigo frequency, headache burden, and dizziness-related disability. Anti-CGRP therapies including erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, rimegepant, and ubrogepant, were associated with clinically meaningful improvements in vertigo frequency, monthly dizziness days, disability scores, headache outcomes, and patient-reported quality of life.ConclusionA multimodal approach to the clinical evaluation of vestibular migraine is supported by current evidence, and both traditional preventive treatments and CGRP-targeted treatments have demonstrated benefit across vestibular and migraine-related outcomes. CGRP-targeted therapies represent a promising emerging therapeutic option, particularly for patients with persistent or refractory symptoms. however, the limited randomized evidence and scarcity of direct head-to-head comparisons with conventional therapies preclude firm conclusions regarding their comparative effectiveness. Systematic review registration: identifier: CRD420261427685.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.