This retrospective cohort study included 552 consecutive adults (18 years and older) undergoing first resection of supratentorial contrast-enhancing glioma (WHO grade 2 and above, histopathologically confirmed postoperatively) at a single center. The intervention was a preoperative-only prediction model using clinical variables (age, sex, preoperative KPS, preoperative seizures) and MRI-based tumor characteristics extracted via deep learning. There was no reported comparator.
The primary outcome was functional status at one-year follow-up, classified as mortality (KPS = 0), functional dependence (KPS 10-60), or functional independence (KPS = 70 and above). For mortality, the model's ROC-AUC was 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.70-0.84). For functional dependence, the ROC-AUC was 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.52-0.77). For functional independence, the ROC-AUC was 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.63-0.79). The model provided reliable predictions for 18% of patients, moderate uncertainty for 57%, and identified 25% with genuinely unpredictable outcomes.
Safety and tolerability were not reported. Key limitations include that most existing models incorporate histopathological or postoperative variables unavailable before surgery, and MRI-based predictors did not improve performance as the best-performing model included three predictors: age at diagnosis, contrast-enhancing volume, and preoperative KPS.
The practice relevance is that the model enables individualized risk stratification and may help clinicians identify patients with uncertain prognoses warranting more intensive preoperative counseling or follow-up planning. This evidence is observational and preliminary.
View Original Abstract ↓
Background and Objectives Preoperative prediction of functional outcomes in contrast-enhancing glioma could support surgical decision-making and patient counseling, yet most existing models incorporate histopathological or postoperative variables unavailable before surgery. Our objectives were to develop a preoperative-only prediction model for one-year functional status and evaluate the added value of MRI-based tumor characteristics beyond clinical predictors. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adults (18 years old and older) undergoing first resection of supratentorial contrast-enhancing glioma (WHO grade 2 and above, histopathologically confirmed postoperatively) at a single center, with one-year follow-up. The primary outcome was functional status classified as mortality (Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) = 0), functional dependence (KPS 10-60), or functional independence (KPS = 70 and above). In addition to clinical variables (age, sex, preoperative KPS, preoperative seizures), a deep learning tool was used to extract structural MRI-based tumor characteristics as predictors. A machine-learning model was developed and conformal prediction was applied to stratify patients by prediction confidence level. Results 552 patients were included (median age: 60 years, range: 18-84; median contrast-enhancing volume: 24 mL, IQR: 10-43; median preoperative KPS: 80, range: 30-100; retrospectively confirmed 88% glioblastoma). Most MRI-based predictors did not improve performance as the best-performing model included three predictors: age at diagnosis, contrast-enhancing volume, preoperative KPS. Bootstrapped areas under the curves were 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.70-0.84) for mortality, 0.64 (0.52-0.77) for functional dependence, and 0.71 (0.63-0.79) for functional independence. F1 scores per class were 0.65, 0.24, 0.65, respectively. Conformal prediction provided reliable predictions for 18% patients, moderate uncertainty for 57%, and identified 25% with genuinely unpredictable outcomes. Discussion Our preoperative machine-learning model predicted one-year functional status in contrast-enhancing glioma with functional independence being the most reliably classified outcome (ROC-AUC = 0.77, F1 score = 0.65) and functional dependence the most challenging to predict (ROC-AUC = 0.64, F1 score = 0.24). A small set of three preoperative predictors drove model performance, supporting generalizability to broader patient populations. Our open-source model enables individualized risk stratification and may help clinicians identify patients with uncertain prognoses warranting more intensive preoperative counseling or follow-up planning.