Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis finds robot-assisted training plus acupuncture improves stroke recovery outcomes

Meta-analysis finds robot-assisted training plus acupuncture improves stroke recovery outcomes
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider robot-assisted training plus acupuncture as an adjunct to improve motor and gait outcomes in stroke rehabilitation.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of robot-assisted training (RAT) combined with acupuncture therapy (AT) versus conventional rehabilitation, RAT alone, or AT alone in stroke patients. The analysis included 1821 participants across multiple studies. The primary outcome was not reported, but secondary outcomes included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), step length, step speed, and step width.

Pooled results showed statistically significant improvements favoring RAT plus AT across all measured outcomes. For FMA-LE, the mean difference (MD) was 4.02 (95% CI [3.12, 4.93]); for FAC, MD = 0.66 (95% CI [0.43, 0.89]); for MBI, MD = 9.88 (95% CI [6.43, 13.33]); for BBS, MD = 6.79 (95% CI [5.43, 8.16]); for step length, MD = 7.42 (95% CI [6.48, 8.36]); for step speed, MD = 0.16 (95% CI [0.12, 0.21]); and for step width, MD = -2.22 (95% CI [3.96, -0.48]), indicating a decrease in step width.

Limitations of the review were not reported, and safety outcomes such as adverse events were not reported. The certainty of evidence and practice relevance were also not addressed. While these findings suggest a potential benefit of combining RAT with acupuncture, clinicians should interpret the results cautiously due to the lack of reported limitations and safety data.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PurposeTo assess the effectiveness of robot-assisted training (RAT) plus acupuncture therapy (AT) on lower limb functional recovery in stroke patients.MethodsThe study protocol was registered with INPLASY (INPLASY2024120107). We searched CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for RCTs comparing RAT plus AT versus conventional rehabilitation, RAT alone, or AT alone. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2.0.ResultsTwenty-one studies (n = 1821) were included. Meta-analyses showed RAT plus AT yielded superior improvements in FMA-LE (MD = 4.02, 95% CI [3.12, 4.93], I = 89%), FAC (MD = 0.66, 95% CI [0.43, 0.89], I = 86%), MBI (MD = 9.88, 95% CI [6.43, 13.33], I = 83%), and BBS (MD = 6.79, 95% CI [5.43, 8.16], I = 90%). Significant improvements were also observed in gait parameters: step length (MD = 7.42, 95% CI [6.48, 8.36], I = 12%), step speed (MD = 0.16, 95% CI [0.12, 0.21], I = 90%), and step width (MD = -2.22, 95% CI [3.96, -0.48], I = 90%). Sensitivity analyses verified the robustness of these findings.ConclusionRAT plus AT effectively ameliorates post-stroke lower limb dysfunction, demonstrating superior improvements in motor function, gait parameters, and daily living activities compared to monotherapies.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.