Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Review of PILS-Stroke questionnaire psychometrics in post-stroke individuals discharged for at least one monthNew tool helps doctors track social life and recovery for people who had a stroke

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note promising potential for monitoring social participation in post-stroke rehabilitation using the PILS-Stroke questionnaire.

This development study review assesses the psychometric properties of the PILS-Stroke questionnaire among post-stroke individuals discharged for at least one month from hospital. The analysis focuses on reliability, construct validity, and correlations with various clinical indicators rather than testing a specific intervention or comparator. No adverse events or discontinuations were reported as safety data were not reported in the source material.

The review demonstrates good reliability with a Person Separation Index of 0.89. High correlation with satisfaction regarding activities or participation was observed with an rs value of 0.7 and a P value less than 0.001. Correlation with performance of motor activities ranged from 0.20 to 0.39 with a P value less than 0.049.

Psychological indicators showed specific associations, including a negative correlation with depression at rs = -0.45 and a positive correlation with confidence at rs = 0.47, both with P values less than 0.001. The authors note promising potential for monitoring patients' social participation and quantifying the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs. Limitations regarding the study phase and setting were not reported.

A recent review looked at a new checklist designed for people who have had a stroke. This tool helps doctors and therapists understand how well patients are doing in their daily lives after leaving the hospital. The study checked if the checklist gives consistent results when used by different people.

The results showed that the checklist is very reliable. It also found a strong link between the scores on the checklist and how happy patients feel about their activities. People who scored higher on the checklist reported being more satisfied with what they could do.

The tool also connected with how well patients could move their bodies and how they felt emotionally. It showed that feeling less depressed and having more confidence went along with better scores. This simple tool could help doctors keep track of patient progress and see if rehab programs are working well.

What this means for you:
This new checklist helps doctors easily track how stroke patients feel and move during their recovery at home.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionAdvances in acute stroke management have increased the number of individuals living with long-term disabilities, presenting challenges in maintaining prior levels of participation in life situations. Return to active participation can be seen as the goal of rehabilitation, given its clear impact on patients‘ quality of life. In this study, we aimed to develop the Participation in Life Situations-Stroke (PILS-Stroke) questionnaire, a self-reported Rasch-built tool for measuring patients' social involvement in meaningful life situations.MethodsWe assembled a 72-item experimental version of PILS-Stroke, which was grounded on patients' and experts' perspectives via an initial item content review followed by item relevance/comprehensibility assessment. We then administered the questionnaire to 105 post-stroke individuals (58% males; mean ± SD: 62 ± 14 years) discharged for at least one month from hospital. Participants rated their involvement in life situations using a 3-point scale (0: “I would like to, but I don't get involved”; 1: “I get involved a little”; 2: “I get involved a lot”; ?: “I don't know/I don't want to get involved”). The responses were analyzed using the Rasch measurement model (RUMM2030+ software) to select the items presenting the best psychometric properties, resulting in an objective and unidimensional measurement tool. Construct validity was assessed using ten clinical measures covering International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) domains (body functions, activities, participation).ResultsThe final 38-item PILS-Stroke demonstrated good reliability [Person Separation Index (PSI) = 0.89] and defined a unidimensional and linear scale for measuring stroke patients' social participation. There was a high correlation between social participation with satisfaction regarding activities/participation (SATIS-Stroke, rs = 0.7, P < 0.001) and weak-to-moderate correlation with performance of motor activities (ACTIVLIM-CS, ABILHAND-CS, ABILOCO-CS; 0.20 ≤ rs ≤ 0.39, P < 0.049) and certain psychological indicators (depression [HADS], rs = −0.45, P < 0.001; confidence [CaSM], rs = 0.47, P < 0.001).ConclusionsPILS-Stroke is a valid and reliable unidimensional tool specifically developed to measure stroke patients' social involvement in life situations. Its psychometric properties show promising potential for monitoring patients' social participation and quantifying the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs promoting their social inclusion.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.