This network meta-analysis of 32 randomized controlled trials involving 1770 participants evaluated non-pharmacological treatments for patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDOC), including minimally conscious state (MCS) and unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS). The interventions assessed were repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), median nerve stimulation (MNS), hyperbaric oxygen (HBO), and acupuncture. The primary outcome was improvement in Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) scores.
All five interventions were associated with improved CRS-R scores compared to control. The mean difference (MD) for overall improvement ranged from 17.32 (rTMS) to 3.56 (acupuncture), with 95% credible intervals (CrI) of 6.57 to 104.25 for rTMS and 0.61 to 40.45 for acupuncture. In the MCS subgroup, MD ranged from 15.99 (tDCS) to 9.72 (MNS), with 95% CrI of 1.57 to 66.77 for tDCS and 2.07 to 61.04 for MNS. In the UWS subgroup, MD ranged from 18.52 (rTMS) to 4.12 (acupuncture), with 95% CrI of 2.15 to 108.73 for rTMS and 0.25 to 69.30 for acupuncture.
The authors note that the credible intervals are wide, indicating substantial uncertainty around the effect estimates. The network meta-analysis provides probabilistic rankings, but direct comparisons between interventions are limited. Safety data were not reported. The findings suggest that these non-pharmacological treatments may promote consciousness recovery, but the evidence is not definitive. Clinicians should interpret the results cautiously and consider individual patient factors when selecting treatment.
View Original Abstract ↓
ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy of non-pharmacological treatments such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), median nerve stimulation (MNS), hyperbaric oxygen (HBO), and acupuncture in improving the level of consciousness in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDOC).MethodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, China Biology Medicine (CBM), and VIP Database were systematically searched from inception to December 2024. Data synthesis and visualization were conducted using the “coda” and “gemtc” packages in R software and STATA 17.0. The Jadad scale was used for initial screening to exclude low-quality studies, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool was applied to assess the methodological quality of included randomized controlled trials (RCTs).ResultsA total of 32 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling 1,770 participants were included in this network meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that rTMS, tDCS, MNS, HBO, and acupuncture were all associated with improved scores on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). The mean difference (MD) ranged from 17.32 (95% CrI: 6.57 to 104.25) in the rTMS group to 3.56 (95% CrI: 0.61 to 40.45) in the acupuncture group. According to the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA), rTMS was associated with the highest probability of being the most effective intervention. In subgroup analyses, among patients with minimally conscious state (MCS), the MD ranged from 15.99 (95% CrI: 1.57 to 66.77) in the tDCS group to 9.72 (95% CrI: 2.07 to 61.04) in the MNS group, and among patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), the MD ranged from 18.52 (95% CrI: 2.15 to 108.73) in the rTMS group to 4.12 (95% CrI: 0.25 to 69.30) in the acupuncture group.ConclusionrTMS, tDCS, MNS, HBO, and acupuncture may improve CRS-R scores and promote consciousness recovery in patients with pDOC. Among these interventions, tDCS may be associated with more favorable effects in patients with MCS, whereas rTMS appears to be more beneficial for those with UWS.