This systematic review identified 1,855 studies, of which 9 met inclusion criteria, examining the use of facial expression recognition (FER) technology in stroke patients. The review synthesized evidence from public/private datasets to evaluate FER's diagnostic utility for stroke and its potential for rehabilitation monitoring.
For diagnostic utility, FER technology demonstrated accuracies ranging from 82 to 98%. In monitoring rehabilitation intensity, one study reported 99.81% accuracy. These findings suggest substantial potential for FER as an auxiliary tool in stroke diagnosis and emerging rehabilitation applications.
However, the authors note considerable limitations. FER models face significant challenges in real-world clinical translation, including variability in patient populations, lighting conditions, and facial impairments post-stroke. The review did not report on adverse events, follow-up duration, or comparator interventions.
Clinicians should interpret these results cautiously. While the accuracy metrics are promising, the evidence is derived from a small number of studies with heterogeneous designs. Further validation in diverse clinical settings is needed before FER can be integrated into routine stroke care.
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundStroke remains a leading cause of long-term disability and mortality worldwide, the early identification and evaluation of rehabilitation effectiveness are of great significance. Facial expression recognition (FER), a computer vision technology, offers potential for early screening and monitoring in many conditions. However, its application in stroke remains underexplored.AimsTo offer insights into how the FER can be used in stroke identification and rehabilitation monitoring.MethodsWe systematically searched four databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, and WanFang, for studies on FER applications in stroke, from database inception to January 2025.ResultsA total of 1,855 studies were identified, of which nine met the inclusion criteria (e.g., 8 diagnostic studies and 1 rehabilitation trial). Eight studies demonstrated FER’s diagnostic utility for stroke, achieving accuracies ranging from 82 to 98% through facial asymmetry analysis during standardized tasks in public/private datasets. Specific tasks such as KISS, SPREAD, and non-speech movements were particularly effective. One study achieved 99.81% accuracy in monitoring rehabilitation intensity by classifying real-time facial expressions to tailor training intensity. The data sources included images (66.7%) and clinical patients database (55.6%).ConclusionFER technology exhibits substantial potential as an auxiliary tool in stroke diagnosis and emerging rehabilitation applications by enabling precise analysis of mandibular and facial movements. Nevertheless, FER models face considerable challenges in real-world clinical translation. Future research could integrate multimodal data and in-the-wild databases to facilitate the clinical implementation of FER technology, thereby improving care delivery for both patients and clinicians and reducing patient mortality and disability.