Spinal cord injury linked to altered cortical excitability response to repeated tDCS

BackgroundSpinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with widespread reorganisation of cortical sensorimotor circuits. Persistent complications such as spasticity and neuropathic pain suggest that homeostatic plasticity, which normally helps stabilise and constrain activity-dependent changes in sensorimotor circuits, may be disrupted after SCI. Homeostatic plasticity can be probed using repeated blocks of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); in healthy individuals, two closely spaced excitatory blocks typically leads to an inhibitory response, reflected as a reduction in corticomotor excitability. ObjectiveTo determine whether individuals with SCI show reduced homeostatic suppression of corticospinal excitability in response to repeated anodal tDCS, compared with healthy controls. MethodsTwenty adults with thoracic or below SCI and 20 healthy controls completed three counterbalanced sessions. Each session comprised two 10-minute blocks of 2 mA tDCS separated by 5 minutes, with the second block always being anodal tDCS over left primary motor cortex. The first block was either anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS, yielding 3 condition types: anodal-anodal, cathodal-anodal, and sham-anodal. To assess corticomotor excitability, transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were elicited at baseline, after priming, and every 5 minutes for 60 minutes after the second block. The primary outcome was percent change in MEP amplitude from baseline. ResultsIn the anodal-anodal condition, the SCI group showed greater facilitation than controls over 0-30 minutes (estimate = 83.09, 95% CI 49.75 to 116.43, p < 0.001), suggestive of a weaker homeostatic response. The cathodal-anodal condition led to a significant overall facilitatory effect with no between-group difference, while the sham-anodal condition showed no change in MEP amplitude relative to baseline. Within the SCI group, exploratory subgroup analysis suggests that those with neuropathic pain and a traumatic injury showed greater facilitation in the anodal-anodal condition than those without these features, indicative of a weaker homeostatic response. ConclusionsSCI is associated with impairment in the homeostatic regulation of corticomotor excitability following repeated excitatory brain stimulation. Disrupted plasticity stabilisation may be relevant to persistent symptoms such as neuropathic pain.