Endovascular thrombectomy improves outcomes in large-core stroke within 24 hoursEndovascular thrombectomy improves outcomes for patients with large-core ischaemic stroke

BACKGROUND: Patients with extensive ischaemic change are often excluded from endovascular thrombectomy. We aimed to synthesise the evidence from recent trials in these patients by performing a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis to estimate treatment benefit, including within clinical and imaging subgroups. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed and Embase for randomised trials published between March 1, 2018, and March 1, 2025, that evaluated efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy compared with medical management in patients with large-core ischaemic stroke (based on an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score [ASPECTS] of ≤5 or estimated ischaemic core ≥50 mL) presenting within 24 h of onset. Individual patient-level data from all eligible trials were obtained. A central imaging core laboratory readjudicated ASPECTS and reanalysed ischaemic core volume. A two-stage meta-analysis with random-effects model was used to evaluate the distribution of 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores (the primary outcome) using adjusted pooled generalised odds ratios (aGenORs). Missing data were handled by multiple imputation. Safety outcomes were all-cause mortality within 90-day follow-up and neurological worsening within 24-48 h of randomisation, reported as adjusted pooled relative risk (aRR); and symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage within 36 h of randomisation (reported as risk difference). Subgroup analyses based on clinical and imaging characteristics were done, including subgroups defined by ischaemic core volume, ASPECTS, and time window from onset to randomisation. The meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251058584). FINDINGS: We included 1886 patients (944 assigned to endovascular thrombectomy and 942 assigned to medical management) from six trials. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. At day 90, the distribution of mRS scores was improved in patients in the endovascular thrombectomy group (median score 4 [IQR 3-6]; n=940) versus those in the medical management group (5 [4-6]; n=931; aGenOR 1·63 [95% CI 1·42-1·88], p<0·0001). The endovascular thrombectomy group also had reduced mortality (292 [31·1%]) compared with the medical management group (347 [37·3%]; aRR 0·82 [95% CI 0·70-0·97], p=0·022). No significant differences were observed in symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (ten [1·1%] of 944 vs nine [1·0%] of 942 patients; pooled unadjusted risk difference -0·17 percentage points [95% CI -1·01 to 0·67], p=0·69) or neurological worsening (197 [22·0%] of 896 patients vs 161 [17·9%] of 899; aRR 1·19 [0·87-1·62], p=0·27). Improved functional outcomes with endovascular thrombectomy were consistent across clinical and imaging subgroups, except for those with an estimated ischaemic core volume of 150 mL or greater, in whom point estimates favoured endovascular thrombectomy, particularly in the early time window (0-6 h), but wide 95% CIs limited interpretation. INTERPRETATION: Endovascular thrombectomy was associated with improved functional outcomes and reduced mortality versus medical management in patients with large-core ischaemic stroke presenting within 24 h of onset. With the exception of very extensive ischaemic changes (core volume ≥150 mL) presenting beyond 6 h, where evidence remains limited, benefit was sustained across ASPECTS and ischaemic core strata for patients presenting up to 24 h after onset. FUNDING: None.