Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

In critically ill adults, greater quadriceps thickness and circumference independently predicted lower 28-day mortality riskIs your thigh muscle size a warning sign for survival in the ICU?

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that greater quadriceps thickness and circumference were independently associated with lower 28-day mortality in critically ill adults.

A prospective cohort study involving 603 critically ill adults assessed the prognostic value of quadriceps mass and mid-upper arm circumference on 28-day mortality. Measurements included quadriceps thickness (QT-min and QT-max) and quadriceps circumference (QC) obtained via bedside ultrasonography and circumference techniques at admission. The primary outcome was mortality within 28 days of admission.

In multivariable analysis, quadriceps circumference (QC) demonstrated an independent protective association with mortality, with a hazard ratio of 0.95 per 1-cm increase (95% CI 0.91–1.00). Quadriceps thickness at minimum (QT-min) showed a stronger protective association, with a hazard ratio of 0.63 per 1-cm increase (95% CI 0.42–0.92). Similarly, quadriceps thickness at maximum (QT-max) was an independent protective factor, associated with a hazard ratio of 0.42 per 1-cm increase (95% CI 0.20–0.85).

Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) was not identified as an independent protective factor for mortality in this cohort. The study did not report specific adverse events, tolerability issues, or discontinuations related to the measurement procedures. No funding conflicts or specific limitations were detailed in the provided data, and the study design precludes causal conclusions regarding the relationship between muscle mass and survival outcomes.

Given the observational nature of this prospective cohort, these results should be interpreted as associations rather than evidence of causation. While the findings highlight quadriceps metrics as potential prognostic indicators in critically ill adults, further research is needed to validate these associations and explore clinical utility. Clinicians should consider these measurements as part of a broader assessment rather than standalone predictors.

Imagine being in the ICU, fighting for your life. Doctors often look at many things to guess your chances. This study looked closely at one specific sign: the size of the muscle in your upper leg, called the quadriceps. They measured this in 603 critically ill adults right when they arrived at the hospital.

The results were clear. When the thigh muscles were thicker, the risk of dying within 28 days went down. Specifically, every extra centimeter of thigh muscle thickness lowered the risk. This held true whether they measured the muscle depth or the total width of the thigh.

However, measuring the arm did not show the same protective benefit. This study found a strong link between strong leg muscles and survival, but it cannot prove that building muscle will save lives. It simply shows that patients with bigger thigh muscles were less likely to die in the short term.

What this means for you:
Thicker thigh muscles were linked to lower death risk in critically ill adults, but this study shows association, not cause.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundSkeletal muscle mass is a key indicator of physiological reserve in critical illness.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate whether quadriceps mass assessed by bedside methods predicts 28-day mortality in critically ill patients.MethodsIn this prospective study of 603 critically ill adults, we measured quadriceps thickness by ultrasonography under minimal transducer pressure (QT-min) and maximal transducer pressure (QT-max), quadriceps circumference (QC), and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) at admission. Cox regression was used to analyze the association between quadriceps thickness and 28-day mortality. Interaction and subgroup analyses were conducted for age, sex, BMI, mechanical ventilation, number of organ supports and vasopressor use.ResultsThe 28-day mortality rate was 21.06% (127/603). After adjustment in Model 3, QC (HR 0.95 per 1-cm increase, 95% CI 0.91–1.00), QT-min (HR 0.63 per 1-cm increase, 95% CI 0.42–0.92), and QT-max (HR 0.42 per 1-cm increase, 95% CI 0.20–0.85) remained independent protective factors for mortality, while MUAC do not. Significant interactions were found for QT-min with vasopressor use and organ support (q 
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.