Molecular-profile guided adjuvant treatment shows cost-effectiveness versus standard VBT in HIR-EC
This phase 3 randomized controlled trial (PORTEC-4a) evaluated the cost-utility of molecular-integrated-risk-profile guided adjuvant treatment compared to standard vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) in 564 women with early-stage (high)intermediate risk endometrial cancer (HIR-EC) across an international setting. The analysis used a three-year follow-up period and a healthcare payer perspective.
Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were comparable between groups (p=0.58). Total healthcare costs were somewhat lower in the molecular-profile arm (€11,898 vs €13,047, p=0.11), driven by significantly lower costs spent up until recurrence (€9,995 vs €11,926, p<0.01). Costs for treatment of recurrence showed no significant difference (€1,903 vs €1,121, p=0.17). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 per QALY, the molecular-profile guided strategy was 89% likely to be cost-effective.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported in this cost-utility abstract. Key limitations include that the primary clinical outcome of the PORTEC-4a trial is not specified here, and some cost comparisons did not reach statistical significance. The cost-effectiveness probability is model-based at a specific threshold. The practice relevance is restrained; while these results support implementing molecular profiling, clinicians should await the full trial report detailing primary efficacy and safety outcomes before changing practice.