Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Perspective Review Evaluates Informed Free Choice Model for HIV Care in U.S. and Global Settings

Perspective Review Evaluates Informed Free Choice Model for HIV Care in U.S. and Global Settings
Photo by Isaac Smith / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Recognize this perspective review as a conceptual discussion on HIV care models lacking empirical outcome data.

This publication is classified as a perspective review focusing on HIV care models. It addresses people living with HIV (PLWH) within U.S. and global settings. The text compares the Informed Free Choice model against conventional shared decision-making approaches to determine potential shifts in patient engagement strategies and comprehensive care delivery systems.

The authors synthesize arguments regarding the implications of the Informed Free Choice model for modern healthcare delivery systems and structures. They highlight potential significant impacts on clinical practice, guideline development, and future research directions. No primary or secondary outcomes were reported in this source, limiting direct clinical application without further data.

The review does not report sample sizes, follow-up durations, or specific statistical results from empirical studies. Safety data, including adverse events and discontinuations, are not reported. The authors do not provide quantitative evidence to support causal claims regarding the model's efficacy compared to current standard care protocols.

Clinicians should recognize this as a conceptual framework rather than empirical trial data when considering implementation. The discussion offers implications for practice but lacks numerical grounding for specific patient outcomes or safety profiles. Further research is noted as very necessary to validate the proposed approach effectively within diverse populations globally and locally.

Study Details

Study typeGuideline
EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Recent shifts in U.S. and global HIV perinatal guidelines have reopened long-constrained conversations about infant feeding for people living with HIV (PLWH), including the option of breast/chestfeeding under conditions of viral suppression. While these changes represent meaningful progress, they unfold within a historical and contemporary landscape shaped by medical racism, gender-based oppression, criminalization, and persistent HIV stigma - forces that continue to constrain autonomy and trust in care. In this Perspective, we propose the Informed Free Choice model, a reproductive justice informed framework that moves beyond conventional shared decision-making to explicitly address structural inequities, power dynamics, and the lived realities of families affected by HIV. Drawing on interdisciplinary clinical practice, community advocacy, and participatory training and organizing with women living with HIV, we situate infant feeding decisions within multilevel systems of care and governance. We argue that Informed Free Choice requires not only accurate risk–benefit counseling, but also meaningful involvement of people living with HIV (MIPA), interdisciplinary care teams, trauma-informed and culturally responsive practices, and policy alignment that protects families from coercion, surveillance, and punishment. We conclude by outlining implications for clinical practice, guideline development, and future research, positioning Informed Free Choice as a necessary evolution in perinatal HIV care that aligns scientific advances with reproductive justice and health equity.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.