Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review finds inconclusive links between pregnancy factors and breast cancer risk in daughters

Systematic review finds inconclusive links between pregnancy factors and breast cancer risk in daugh…
Photo by João Paulo de Souza Oliveira / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note inconclusive links between pregnancy factors and breast cancer risk in daughters.

A systematic review and meta-analysis examined the relationship between various pregnancy-related factors and breast cancer risk among daughters. The study pooled data from fifty-two studies to assess exposures including maternal and paternal age, gestational age at birth, twin status, and maternal preeclampsia. The primary outcome of interest was the risk of developing breast cancer in adulthood.

The analysis suggested a possible increased risk associated with maternal age up to thirty years, though statistical significance was not definitively established. In contrast, no associations were found for gestational age, twin status, or maternal preeclampsia. Initial signals for paternal age appeared to disappear upon subgroup analysis, further complicating the interpretation of these early-life factors.

The authors highlight significant limitations, noting heterogeneity specifically regarding maternal preeclampsia data and inconclusive findings for other pregnancy-related exposures. They emphasize that causation cannot be inferred from these observational associations. Consequently, the certainty of the conclusions remains uncertain, particularly for preeclampsia, and clinical recommendations based on these specific exposures should be cautious.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pregnancy-related exposures have been proposed as potential risk factors for breast cancer later in life, but findings remain inconclusive. This study aimed to update evidence on the associations between the exposure to pregnancy-related factors occurring up to birth-maternal and paternal age, gestational age at birth, twin status, and maternal preeclampsia-and breast cancer risk in daughters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Searches were performed in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, and Scopus. We included observational analytical studies assessing associations between parental age, gestational age, twin status, and maternal preeclampsia and breast cancer risk in daughters, reporting effect measures with 95% confidence intervals (CI) or sufficient data for calculation. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A dose-response meta-analysis evaluated the effects of maternal and paternal age, while random-effects models assessed the effects of gestational age, twin status, and maternal preeclampsia. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic and publication bias through funnel plots and Egger's tests. RESULTS: Fifty-two studies met the inclusion criteria; 57.7% were high quality. Breast cancer risk increased with maternal age up to 30 years (I = 10.7%, P = .26). A possible association for paternal age (I = 33.8%, P = .08) disappeared in subgroup analysis (I = 1.0%). No associations were found for gestational age (pooled OR [pOR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.10), twin status (pOR 1.19, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.46), or maternal preeclampsia (pOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.64). CONCLUSIONS: Increased maternal age may influence breast cancer risk in daughters. No associations were found for paternal age, gestational age, or twin status; conclusions for maternal preeclampsia remain uncertain due to heterogeneity.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.