When prostate cancer starts to return after surgery or radiation, the standard next step is often hormone therapy, which can come with difficult side effects. A new study asked if a different treatment—a targeted radiation drug called Lu-PSMA-617—could delay that step and keep the cancer in check longer. The trial involved 58 men whose cancer was beginning to spread to a few sites. The results were striking: within the first 30 weeks, cancer progressed in only 7% of men who received the drug, compared to 93% of men who were monitored as usual. On average, the drug extended the time before the cancer worsened from 5 months to 25 months. The treatment was generally well-tolerated, with most side effects like dry mouth and fatigue being mild. However, it's important to remember this is a phase 2 trial with a small number of patients. While the results are promising and show a clear signal, we need larger studies to confirm the benefit and understand the long-term effects before this could become a standard option.
Lu-PSMA-617 reduces disease progression versus deferred ADT in oligometastatic HSPC in phase 2 trialCan a targeted radiation drug delay prostate cancer progression without hormone therapy?
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work
This phase 2 randomized controlled trial enrolled 58 eligible men with biochemically recurrent oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) following radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy from academic and community hospitals in the Netherlands and Cyprus. Patients were randomized to receive Lu-PSMA-617 (two cycles of 7.4 GBq every 6 weeks, with potential for two additional cycles) or to standard of care with deferred androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and active monitoring.
The primary outcome was disease progression. During the first 30 weeks, disease progression occurred in 2 of 29 (7%) patients in the Lu-PSMA-617 group versus 27 of 29 (93%) in the control group (p<0.0001). Median progression-free survival was 25 months (IQR 15 to not reached) for the intervention group versus 5 months (IQR 3-7) for the control group (HR 0.07, 95% CI 0.03-0.17; p<0.0001).
Regarding safety, in the Lu-PSMA-617 group, grade 3 adverse events included dry eyes in 1 (3%) patient and lymphocyte count decrease in 3 (10%) patients. Common low-grade events were dry mouth (66%), fatigue (55%), and nausea (48%). No serious adverse events were reported with Lu-PSMA-617. In the control group, grade 3-4 events included hypertension (17%), lymphocyte count decrease (3%), gallbladder infection (3%), and myocardial infarction (3%).
Key limitations include the small sample size (58 patients) and the phase 2 design, which precludes definitive conclusions. The study was funded by the Dutch Prostate Cancer Foundation and Novartis. While the results are promising, they should be interpreted cautiously, and clinical application should await validation from larger phase 3 trials.