Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Wasting is associated with higher chemotherapy toxicity and reduced survival in pediatric cancer patientsMalnutrition in Pediatric Cancer Patients Linked to Poorer Outcomes

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that MUAC-based screening may be more sensitive than weight-based metrics for detecting wasting in pediatric cancer patients.

This meta-analysis evaluated the prevalence of wasting or acute malnutrition among 2,419 pediatric cancer patients in Africa. The analysis found a wasting prevalence of 39.7% (95% CI: 30.7%-49.1%), with individual study results ranging from 11.7% to 67.6%.

The authors synthesized data showing that Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) consistently detected substantially higher rates of malnutrition than weight-based metrics like weight-for-height or BMI. Furthermore, wasting was associated with higher chemotherapy toxicity, treatment-related neutropenia, and sepsis, as well as reduced overall survival. These associations were specifically observed in two of the included cohorts.

The authors noted high heterogeneity (I2 = 95.3%), resulting in a very low GRADE certainty of evidence. Despite this uncertainty, the findings suggest that MUAC-based screening may be a more sensitive tool than weight-based metrics for identifying malnutrition in patients with large solid tumors. Clinical application should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of cohorts reporting outcomes related to toxicity and survival.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in understanding nutritional status in pediatric oncology populations. While previous coverage noted that sarcopenia triples dysphagia odds across cancers, this study specifically focuses on wasting and acute malnutrition in an African pediatric cohort. It provides evidence that MUAC is more sensitive than weight-based metrics for identifying these conditions.

A review of data from over 2,400 children with cancer in Africa found that nearly 40% of these patients suffer from wasting or acute malnutrition. The study highlights a significant range in reported cases across different locations, showing how common this issue is in the region.

Researchers also looked at how doctors identify malnutrition. They found that using Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) consistently detected higher rates of malnutrition than weight-based methods like BMI. This suggests that MUAC might be a more sensitive tool for identifying patients who need extra nutritional support, especially those with large solid tumors.

While the evidence is limited due to differences in how studies were conducted, some data showed a link between wasting and serious complications. These included higher chemotherapy toxicity, neutropenia, sepsis, and lower overall survival rates. Because these findings come from a small number of groups, it is important to talk to doctors about specific treatment plans.

What this means for you:
Malnutrition in children with cancer is linked to more severe side effects and lower survival rates.

Common questions

How common is malnutrition in children with cancer?

The study found that approximately 39.7% of pediatric cancer patients in Africa experienced wasting or acute malnutrition. However, the reported prevalence varied significantly across different studies, ranging from 11.7% to 67.6%.

What are the risks associated with wasting for these patients?

In some groups studied, wasting was linked to higher chemotherapy toxicity, treatment-related neutropenia, and sepsis. These conditions were also associated with reduced overall survival rates in those specific cases.

Is there a better way to screen for malnutrition?

The study found that using Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) consistently detected higher rates of malnutrition than weight-based methods like BMI or weight-for-height. This makes MUAC a potentially more sensitive tool for identifying patients with large solid tumors.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up228.0 mo
PublishedJan 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is a prevalent and modifiable co-morbidity in paediatric oncology, yet no comprehensive pan-African synthesis of its burden has been conducted. This systematic review and meta-analysis estimated the pooled prevalence of wasting and acute malnutrition among paediatric cancer patients in Africa, evaluated the impact of diagnostic assessment methods on reported prevalence, and characterised associations with adverse clinical outcomes. METHODS: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science for observational studies published from January 2000 to December 2025 reporting wasting or acute malnutrition among children and adolescents (0-19 years) with confirmed malignancies in African healthcare settings. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and appraised quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. Pooled prevalence was calculated using a random-effects model with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic and Cochran's Q test. Publication bias was evaluated with Egger's regression test. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Sixteen independent cohorts comprising 2,419 paediatric cancer patients across eight African countries were included. The pooled prevalence of wasting or acute malnutrition was 39.7% (95% CI: 30.7%-49.1%), with individual study estimates ranging from 11.7% to 67.6%. Between-study heterogeneity was substantial (I² = 95.3%; 95% CI: 92.7%-96.1%, p < 0.001). Studies using mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) consistently detected substantially higher rates of malnutrition than those relying on weight-for-height or body mass index criteria from the same patient populations. No significant publication bias was detected (Egger's test p = 0.503). GRADE certainty of evidence was very low, primarily due to heterogeneity. Wasting was independently associated with higher chemotherapy toxicity, treatment-related neutropenia, sepsis, and reduced overall survival across two of the included cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Wasting and malnutrition affects about two in five children with cancer in the African countries studied. The diagnostic tool employed is the single most consequential determinant of detected prevalence, and weight-based metrics alone are inadequate in populations with large solid tumours. Universal adoption of MUAC-based screening, structured algorithm-guided nutritional intervention, and integration of socioeconomic vulnerability assessment into routine oncological care are evidence-based priorities for improving treatment tolerability and survival in this population.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.