Meta-analysis finds immunotherapy efficacy in HCC varies by aetiology, strongest in HBV-related disease
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined 26 studies to compare the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies versus non-ICI controls in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), stratified by aetiology (viral vs nonviral). The population included patients with HCC, with data sourced from multiple databases up to June 2025. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
In indirect comparisons of ICI versus non-ICI controls, OS hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.67 for HBV-HCC, 0.84 for HCV-HCC, and 0.88 for nonviral HCC, indicating the survival benefit was most significant in HBV-related disease. For PFS, HRs were 0.58 for HBV-HCC, 0.75 for HCV-HCC, and 0.71 for nonviral HCC. In direct comparisons among patients receiving ICIs, viral HCC was associated with significantly superior PFS over nonviral HCC (HR 0.84), with a trend toward improved OS (HR 0.91).
Safety and tolerability data were not reported in the provided evidence. Key limitations include observed heterogeneity, partly attributable to geographic region and treatment-line variations. Funding and conflict of interest information was not reported.
The authors conclude that aetiology is a key determinant of treatment response and should be integrated as a stratification factor in clinical practice and trial design. These findings are based on aggregated observational and trial data; the trend toward improved OS in viral HCC requires cautious interpretation. Clinical application should consider this evidence alongside individual patient factors and treatment guidelines.