Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Pyridostigmine improves symptoms and reduces costs in adults with AChR MG in a crossover trial.

Pyridostigmine improves symptoms and reduces costs in adults with AChR MG in a crossover trial.
Photo by Ayanda Kunene / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider pyridostigmine for symptom improvement in AChR MG, but note small trial and post hoc cost analysis.

This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial conducted at Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands, involving 19 adults with anti-acetylcholine receptor-positive myasthenia gravis (AChR MG) who were on stable standard-of-care therapy and currently using pyridostigmine. The intervention was pyridostigmine compared to placebo, with the primary outcome being change in the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII) score, and secondary outcomes included the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scale, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score, and revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MG-QOL15r) questionnaire.

Main results showed pyridostigmine provided benefit over placebo across all efficacy measures: the MGII score had an estimated mean difference of 5.3 (95% CI 1.9-8.7, p = 0.004), QMG score 1.4 (95% CI 0.5-2.3), MG-ADL score 1.2 (95% CI 0.5-1.8), and MG-QOL15r score 2.0 (95% CI 0.03-3.91). A post hoc cost-utility analysis over 708.0 months indicated lower annual societal costs by €6,565 (95% CI €328-€15,945) and improved annual quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.106 (95% CI 0.019-0.210). Safety and tolerability data were not reported.

Key limitations include the small sample size of 19 patients and the post hoc nature of the cost-utility analysis, which was a mathematical model, potentially limiting generalizability and certainty. The study provides Class I evidence, but clinicians should interpret these findings with restraint due to the limited population and lack of safety details, considering pyridostigmine's established role in MG management while acknowledging the need for larger trials to confirm cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 19
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up708.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pyridostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, is a symptomatic drug approved for the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG), but no randomized controlled trials substantiate its widespread use. We aimed to assess the efficacy and cost utility of pyridostigmine in patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor-positive MG (AChR MG). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial was conducted at Leiden University Medical Center, a tertiary center for the treatment of MG in the Netherlands. Main eligibility criteria were current use of pyridostigmine and a stable dose of other MG treatments. Participants were assigned to a sequence of 2 treatment periods for 5 days separated by a 2-day washout, in which patients either first received placebo and then pyridostigmine, or vice versa. Pyridostigmine dosing matched each participant's prestudy regimen. The primary outcome was change in the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII) score. Secondary efficacy outcome measures included the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scale, the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score, and the revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MG-QOL15r) questionnaire. For the post hoc cost-utility analysis, a mathematical model was developed to translate the observed study results into long-term annual effect on societal costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: A total of 19 patients (median age 59 years, 58% female) were recruited between March 23, 2023, and February 21, 2024. The estimated mean difference in the MGII score between pyridostigmine and placebo interventions was 5.3 (95% CI 1.9-8.7, = 0.004). Secondary efficacy outcome measures showed estimated mean differences of 1.4 (95% CI 0.5-2.3) for the QMG score, 1.2 (95% CI 0.5-1.8) for the MG-ADL score, and 2.0 (95% CI 0.03-3.91) for the MG-QoL15r score. The post hoc cost-utility analysis showed lower annual societal costs (€6,565, 95% CI €328-€15,945) and annual improved QALYs (0.106, 95% CI 0.019-0.210) for patients using pyridostigmine. DISCUSSION: This trial showed that, in patients with AChR MG chronically treated with pyridostigmine, pyridostigmine demonstrated benefit over placebo across all efficacy outcome measures and substantially reduced societal costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: The trial was registered at EudraCT (2021-004110-20, registration date: July 12, 2022) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05919407, registration date: June 16, 2023). First patient enrolled: March 23, 2023. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that, in adults with AChR ab-positive ocular or generalized MG on stable standard-of-care therapy and currently using pyridostigmine, pyridostigmine improves MG symptoms compared with placebo.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.