Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery shows marginally higher 6-month local control than hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapySingle-fraction radiation shows slight edge in controlling brain metastases

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that SF-SRS and HF-SRT offer similar outcomes, with SF-SRS showing only a marginal early local control advantage.

This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) compared to hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HF-SRT) for treating resection cavities from limited brain metastases. The analysis included 589 patients and 649 resection cavities. The primary finding was a marginally higher local control at 6 months with SF-SRS (RR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09, p = 0.006). However, the trend favoring SF-SRS at 12 months was not statistically significant (RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.99-1.14, p = 0.08).

Regarding survival outcomes, there was no significant difference in overall survival at 12 months between the two approaches (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.82-1.41, p = 0.59). The authors note that the 6-month local control advantage for SF-SRS may reflect baseline imbalances rather than a true treatment effect, as HF-SRT was often reserved for larger or more complex cavities.

Clinical application is tempered by the retrospective nature of the included studies. While SF-SRS may offer a small early local control advantage, both modalities result in broadly similar outcomes. Prospective randomized trials are required to confirm these findings and address the limitations of the current evidence.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in comparing specific radiation delivery techniques for brain metastases. It complements existing evidence regarding radiation techniques, such as the finding that SRS alone for brain metastases avoids cognitive decline compared to adding WBRT, and the finding that WBRT shows no significant survival benefit in thyroid cancer brain metastases.

When a patient faces brain metastases, the goal of treatment is often to keep the cancer from returning in the area where it was removed. Doctors have two main ways to deliver radiation: a single large dose (SF-SRS) or several smaller doses over time (HF-SRT). This study looked at 589 patients to see which method worked better for controlling the cancer locally.

The results showed that the single-dose approach had a slightly higher rate of local control at the six-month mark. However, this small advantage was not confirmed at the twelve-month mark. When looking at overall survival at one year, there was no significant difference between the two radiation methods.

It is important to note that these findings come from a retrospective study, which means the data was collected after the fact. Some differences in the early results might be due to the types of cavities being treated rather than the radiation itself. Because of these factors, more future research is needed to confirm the best path forward.

What this means for you:
Single-dose radiation shows a slight early advantage in local control, but both methods show similar overall survival.

Common questions

What is the difference between the two radiation methods?

The two methods are single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HF-SRT). SF-SRS delivers the radiation in one session, while HF-SRT delivers it in multiple sessions. The study found that both methods resulted in similar overall survival rates for patients at the twelve-month mark.

Is one treatment better for controlling the tumor locally?

The single-dose method (SF-SRS) showed a marginally higher rate of local control at six months compared to the multi-dose method. However, this advantage was not statistically significant at the twelve-month mark. Because of these mixed results, you should talk to your doctor about which option fits your specific case.

Are there any known risks or side effects for these treatments?

The study did not report specific data on adverse events, serious side effects, or treatment discontinuations for either radiation method. Because this was a retrospective study, it cannot provide a full picture of safety. Always consult with your medical team regarding the risks and benefits of your specific treatment plan.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 589
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up6.0 mo
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is widely used after resection of limited brain metastases, but the optimal fractionation remains uncertain. Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) is convenient and well established, whereas hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HF-SRT) may improve dose delivery and normal tissue tolerance in larger or more complex cavities. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared these two postoperative approaches. PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched from inception to December 23, 2025. Original comparative studies enrolling adults treated with postoperative cavity-directed stereotactic radiotherapy were included. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. Seven retrospective comparative studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 589 patients and 649 resection cavities. The most common primary tumor was non-small cell lung cancer followed by melanoma and breast cancer. The RT dose in the single fraction population was between 15 and 20 Gy across the studies. Also, the hypofractionated regimen consisted of 3 to 6 fractions with the total dose being anywhere from 14 to 32.5 Gy. At 6 months, local control was marginally higher with SF-SRS than HF-SRT (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09, p = 0.006). However, given that HF-SRT was preferentially used for larger or anatomically complex cavities, this difference likely reflects baseline imbalances rather than a true treatment effect. The 12-month local control analysis showed a non-significant trend favoring SF-SRS (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.14, p = 0.08). Three studies were pooled for 12-month overall survival, with no significant difference between approaches (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.82-1.41, p = 0.59). The available comparative retrospective evidence suggests that SF-SRS and HF-SRT achieve broadly similar postoperative outcomes for resected limited brain metastasis although HF-SRT cohorts included larger or deeply seated lesions. Nevertheless, SF-SRS may offer a small early local control advantage. Prospective randomized studies are needed to define the optimal postoperative strategy.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.