Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Focused ultrasound shows HPV clearance, LSIL resolution in meta-analysis of observational studies

Focused ultrasound shows HPV clearance, LSIL resolution in meta-analysis of observational studies
Photo by Francesco Ungaro / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider focused ultrasound for LSIL with hrHPV, but note evidence is observational and low-to-moderate quality.

This meta-analysis examined the efficacy of focused ultrasound treatment for women with cervical LSIL and concurrent high-risk HPV infection. The analysis synthesized observational studies, comparing focused ultrasound against observation groups and interferon treatment. The primary outcome was HPV clearance, with secondary outcomes including LSIL resolution (normal cervical biopsy at follow-up) and normal cytology at follow-up from abnormal ThinPrep cytology results.

For the main results, focused ultrasound was associated with HPV clearance in 74% of cases (ES = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.64-0.85, P < 0.001). LSIL resolution occurred in 94% of women with LSIL histology before treatment (ES = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.97, P < 0.001). Normal cytology at follow-up was observed in 87% of women with abnormal TCT results (ES = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.96, P < 0.001). Compared to observation, focused ultrasound showed significantly higher HPV clearance (OR = 3.58, 95% CI: 2.21-5.81, P < 0.001). Compared to interferon treatment, it was also superior (OR = 4.22, 95% CI: 1.12-15.96, P = 0.034).

Safety and tolerability data were not reported in the meta-analysis. Key limitations include the observational nature of all included studies and geographic concentration of the research. The quality of evidence across studies was rated as low to moderate. The practice relevance was not specifically reported, but the findings suggest focused ultrasound may be associated with favorable outcomes for HPV clearance and LSIL resolution in this population, though stronger evidence is needed.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMar 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection is a major risk factor for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and cervical cancer. Although HPV vaccines effectively prevent infections with vaccine-covered HPV types, they do not eliminate established infections. Additionally, not all HPV types associated with cervical cancer are covered by the vaccine. Therefore, treatment strategies for HPV-related cervical lesions remain an important clinical challenge. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies evaluating the efficacy of focused ultrasound in treating HPV and cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL). Ten eligible observational studies were included. Study quality was assessed using the MINORS criteria, and evidence quality was evaluated based on GRADE guidelines. A meta-analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software. Focused ultrasound treatment led to HPV clearance in 74% of cases (ES = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.64-0.85, P < 0.001). Additionally, 94% of women with LSIL histology before treatment had a normal cervical biopsy at follow-up (ES = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.97, P < 0.001), and 87% of women with abnormal ThinPrep cytology (TCT) results had normal cytology at follow-up (ES = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.96, P < 0.001). Compared to the observation group, focused ultrasound treatment was significantly more effective in clearing HPV (OR = 3.58, 95% CI: 2.21-5.81, P < 0.001). Similarly, focused ultrasound was superior to interferon treatment for HPV clearance (OR = 4.22, 95% CI: 1.12-15.96, P = 0.034). The quality of evidence across studies was rated as low to moderate. This meta-analysis demonstrates that focused ultrasound achieves a 74% HPV clearance rate and 94% LSIL resolution in women with cervical LSIL and concurrent hrHPV infection. While superior to observation and interferon, the evidence remains low-to-moderate due to the observational nature and geographic concentration of included studies. Future multicenter RCTs are essential to validate these results and assess long-term outcomes, including recurrence and obstetric safety.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.