Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Rapid growth in tumor immunometabolism research since 2020 reflects expanding interest in immunotherapyMapping the Rapid Growth of Cancer Immunotherapy Research Trends

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that research volume in tumor immunometabolism has increased significantly since 2020.

This systematic review provides a bibliometric mapping of literature records from 2001 to 2025 concerning tumor immunometabolism and immunotherapy. The analysis included 3,214 records from Web of Science and 3,513 from Scopus to map research trends, publication growth, and citation structures.

Key findings indicate a substantial increase in research activity recently, with publications from 2020 to 2025 representing 83.7% of Web of Science records and 83.0% of Scopus records. The analysis also identified that China contributed the most publications (1,470) in the Web of Science dataset. Citation metrics showed the USA had more total citations (70,049) and a higher mean citation rate (96.4) compared to China (55,911 citations; 38.0 mean rate).

Structural differences between article types were noted: articles involved larger teams (median 10) than reviews (median 4), while reviews cited more references (median 136) than articles (median 50). These findings characterize the growth and structure of the scientific literature field. Because this is a bibliometric mapping of literature records, the results do not provide clinical evidence for patient outcomes or treatment efficacy.

How this fits prior evidence

This bibliometric mapping identifies a significant increase in research volume regarding tumor immunometabolism and immunotherapy since 2020. While it does not directly address the specific mechanisms of DUBs in cancer stem cell plasticity or the clinical management of refractory cancer pain, it maps the broader scientific landscape of the field. The findings confirm a rapidly expanding research environment for the underlying biological mechanisms of cancer and immunotherapy.

This study is a bibliometric mapping review, which means it analyzed thousands of existing research papers rather than testing new treatments on patients. The researchers looked at over 3,500 records from 2001 to 2025 to track how scientific interest in cancer immunometabolism and immunotherapy has changed over time.

The analysis found that the vast majority of research in this field occurred between 2020 and 2025. This indicates a very rapid increase in scientific activity and interest in these specific cancer treatments. While China produced the highest number of total publications, the United States saw a higher average number of citations for its research papers.

Because this is a mapping of research trends and not a clinical trial, the results do not provide information on how well these treatments work for patients or their safety. It simply shows that the scientific community is focusing more heavily on these topics. Readers should view this as a snapshot of scientific trends rather than a guide for clinical care.

What this means for you:
Research into cancer immunometabolism and immunotherapy has seen a massive increase in volume since 2020.

Common questions

What does this study say about the safety of these treatments?

This study did not report on patient safety or side effects. Because it is a bibliometric mapping of research papers rather than a clinical trial, it does not provide information on the safety or effectiveness of cancer immunometabolism or immunotherapy for patients.

How much has interest in these cancer treatments grown?

The study found a significant increase in research activity recently. Between 2020 and 2025, these years accounted for 83.7% of the records in the Web of Science database and 83.0% of the records in the Scopus database.

Who is conducting the most research in this area?

The study found that China contributed the most publications in the field, with 1,470 records. However, research from the United States received a higher average number of citations, with a mean of 96.4 compared to 38.0 for China.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundMetabolic competition, nutrient restriction and metabolite accumulation in the tumor microenvironment reshape immune-cell fate and can constrain immune checkpoint blockade and adoptive cell therapies. We systematically mapped whether the tumor immunometabolism literature has shifted toward immunotherapy-oriented translation.MethodsWe conducted a systematic bibliometric mapping review reported with reference to PRI SMA 2020. Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus were searched on 26 July 2026 for English-language journal articles and reviews published from 2001 to 2025 that linked cancer, immune-cell metabolism and immunotherapy. Prespecified metadata eligibility criteria were applied independently to each database. Web of Science was the primary dataset and Scopus provided parallel validation. Bibliometrix, VO Sviewer and Cite Space characterized publication growth, contributors, citation structure and keyword evolution. Between-group and stratum comparisons used non-parametric tests, with test statistics, effect sizes and Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted P values reported for every comparison.ResultsWe retained 3,214 Web of Science and 3,513 Scopus records. Publications from 2020–2025 represented 83.7% and 83.0% of the respective datasets, reproducing the recent expansion across databases. China contributed the most Web of Science publications (n=1,470), whereas the United States had more total citations (70,049 vs 55,911) and a higher mean citation rate (96.4 vs 38.0 citations per article). Articles involved larger teams than reviews (median 10 vs 4 authors), whereas reviews cited more references (median 136 vs 50; both adjusted p
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.