Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Retrospective cohort of 443 glioma patients analyzed under successive WHO classifications from 2007 to 2021Study reviews glioma diagnosis changes with updated WHO classification criteria

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that limited molecular testing in this Latin American cohort affected glioma classification accuracy under successive WHO criteria.

This retrospective analysis examined 443 patients who underwent elective tumor surgery between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2024 at a high-volume neurosurgical center in Latin America. The population included individuals whose pathology reports were consistent with a glioma. The study assessed diagnostic accuracy across successive WHO classifications from 2007, 2016, and 2021.

Under the WHO 2007 criteria, the most common tumor type identified was glioblastoma, and virtually all tumors were classified histologically. However, the proportion of tumors labeled as NOS and cases with incomplete tumor characterization increased over time. By 2021, 24% of tumors were categorized as high- or low-grade glioma NOS.

Safety data, adverse events, and discontinuations were not reported in this observational study. A key limitation was the limited access to molecular testing, which may have influenced classification outcomes. Consequently, the findings regarding diagnostic accuracy should be interpreted with caution given the study design and resource constraints.

This study looked at how glioma diagnoses changed when doctors used three different World Health Organization (WHO) classification systems from 2007, 2016, and 2021. The researchers reviewed records from 443 patients who had elective tumor surgery at a single center in Latin America between 2010 and 2024.

Under the 2007 criteria, glioblastoma was the most common tumor type, and almost all tumors were classified based on their appearance under a microscope. However, the study found that the proportion of tumors labeled as 'not otherwise specified' (NOS) or with incomplete characterization increased over time. Using the 2021 criteria, 24% of tumors were categorized as high- or low-grade glioma NOS.

The main reason to be careful is that this was a retrospective analysis from one center, and the authors noted limited access to molecular testing, which is now a key part of modern glioma diagnosis. The study does not report any safety concerns, as it focused on diagnostic accuracy, not treatment.

What readers should realistically take from this is that glioma classification is evolving, and newer systems may rely more on molecular information that was not available in this study. This research highlights the challenges in diagnosing brain tumors but does not change current medical practice.

What this means for you:
Updated WHO glioma criteria may increase 'not otherwise specified' diagnoses, but more research is needed.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Background: CNS tumors present significant diagnostic challenges due to their heterogeneity. Successive editions of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification have progressively incorporated molecular markers as essential criteria. Nonetheless, in low- and middle-income countries, limited access to molecular testing hampers the full application of these classifications. To assess this situation, we decided to evaluate the impact of successive WHO classifications on glioma diagnostic accuracy in a high-volume neurosurgical center in Latin America. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients that underwent elective tumor surgery between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2024 and whose pathology report was consistent with a glioma. Demographic, anatomical, histological, and molecular data were collected. Tumors were classified according to WHO CNS Tumor Classification criteria of 2007, 2016, and 2021. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA v15.A total of 443 patients were included. Under WHO 2007 criteria, glioblastoma was the most common tumor type, with virtually all tumors classified histologically. With WHO 2016 implementation, the proportion of tumors labeled as “not otherwise specified” (NOS) and cases with incomplete tumor characterization increased. Application of WHO 2021 further highlighted diagnostic limitations, with 24% of tumors categorized as high- or low-grade glioma NOS, instead of a particular tumor type/entity. This work sheds light on the fact that the progressive complexity of glioma classification with the addition of new molecular and genetic factors may have as a counterpart an increase in the number of cases with inadequate tumor characterization due to the lack of accessibility to key molecular studies in diagnosis.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.