This publication describes a study protocol for a Delphi Expert Consensus survey focused on colorectal cancer management. The primary objective is to achieve expert consensus on the usage of Chinese Herbal Medicine as a complementary therapy. The survey intends to address secondary outcomes including optimal intervention strategies, recommended stage and duration of intervention, safety considerations, and possible herb-drug interactions.
No main results are reported in this document, as it outlines the planned methodology rather than completed findings. Population details, sample size, setting, and follow-up duration are not reported. Consequently, specific efficacy data or adverse event rates cannot be derived from this source. The absence of reported safety data, including serious adverse events or discontinuations, highlights the preliminary nature of this work.
The stated practice relevance is to support safe, consistent, and evidence-informed clinical practice. However, limitations regarding funding or conflicts of interest are not reported. Clinicians should recognize that this represents a planned approach to consensus building rather than established evidence from a completed trial or systematic review. Until the survey is completed and published, recommendations remain theoretical.
Understanding the scope of this protocol is essential for interpreting future findings. The focus on herb-drug interactions suggests a need for vigilance when integrating complementary therapies. Without reported certainty or causality notes, the strength of future recommendations remains uncertain until data collection concludes.
View Original Abstract ↓
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, despite advances in conventional oncological therapies. In recent years, various studies have made advances in integrative oncology, such as investigating the use of Chinese Herbal Medicine (CHM) as a complementary therapy alongside conventional oncological therapies to alleviate treatment-related adverse effects, improve quality of life, and potentially enhance therapeutic outcomes. Despite this, clinical practice in this area remains highly heterogeneous, with limited standardized guidelines on key areas of concern such as (1) optimal intervention, (2) recommended stage and duration of intervention, (3) safety considerations, and (4) possible herb-drug interactions. Hence, this study aims to establish expert consensus on the usage of CHM as a complementary therapy in the management of CRC, to support safe, consistent, and evidence-informed clinical practice. Methods and Analysis: We will employ a modified Delphi technique to achieve consensus amongst a panel of international experts in various fields related to integrative oncology. Prior to the study, a list of questionnaire items was developed based on a systematic review of existing clinical practice guidelines on CRC. An international panel will be invited based on established international profile in integrative oncology research and clinical practice, and by peer referral. Two rounds of Delphi will be conducted using anonymous online questionnaires. Consensus will be considered reached if at least 50% of the panel strongly agree/disagree that an item should be included or excluded while strong consensus will be set at 76%. Items which achieve strong consensus after Round 1 will be removed, before being sent out for Round 2 with a summary of Round 1 responses for a final consensus. Ethics and Dissemination: Ethics approval has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Nanyang Technological University (IRB-2025-1222). Our findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.