This Phase 3 randomized controlled trial enrolled 55 patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma across multiple centers. Patients received either neoadjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel with cisplatin, TP) followed by surgical resection, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with PD-1 blockade (camrelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel and cisplatin/paclitaxel and cisplatin) followed by surgical resection. The primary outcome was pathological response based on Mandard's Tumor Regression Grade scoring system.
In responders, shared temporal dynamics included dendritic cell remodeling, cytotoxic CD8 T cell contraction, and memory T cell expansion. Unique dynamics in chemoimmunotherapy responders involved suppression of clonal expansion of GZMBTIGIT T cells. Non-responders failed to elicit effective antitumor immunity, showed persistent expression of targetable tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), fully preserved HLA machinery, and clonal expansion of dysfunctional GZMBTIGIT T cells.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. The study's limitations include that direct comparisons of tumor microenvironment characteristics and their implications for novel therapeutic development remain largely unexplored. Follow-up duration was not reported.
These findings support the development of TAA-targeted therapeutic vaccines and combination strategies incorporating immune checkpoint blockade to overcome resistance in non-responders. However, given the small sample size and lack of reported effect sizes or p-values, these results should be considered hypothesis-generating.
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) combined with chemotherapy has demonstrated higher response rates than chemotherapy alone in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Although tumor microenvironment (TME) features associated with treatment response have been studied in the contexts of both chemotherapy and immunotherapy, direct comparisons of these characteristics and their implications for novel therapeutic development remain largely unexplored.
METHODS: Paired pretreatment and post-treatment tumor samples were prospectively collected from 55 patients with locally advanced ESCC enrolled in a multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial (ChiCTR2000040034). Patients were randomized to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel with cisplatin, TP; n=14) or its combination with PD-1 blockade (camrelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel and cisplatin/paclitaxel and cisplatin, Cam+nab-TP/TP; n=41), followed by surgical resection. Pathological response was defined based on Mandard's Tumor Regression Grade scoring system. Changes in immune cell populations and tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) within the TME in relation to response were characterized using single-cell RNA and T cell receptor sequencing.
RESULTS: Both chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy responders exhibited shared temporal dynamics including dendritic cell remodeling, cytotoxic CD8 T cell contraction, and memory T cell expansion, with chemoimmunotherapy uniquely suppressing the clonal expansion of GZMBTIGIT T cells. In contrast, non-responders failed to elicit effective antitumor immunity and displayed persistent expression of targetable TAAs, fully preserved HLA machinery, and clonal expansion of dysfunctional GZMBTIGIT T cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies key immune contributors correlated with response to neoadjuvant therapies and a panel of TAAs in non-responders. These findings support the development of TAA-targeted therapeutic vaccines and combination strategies incorporating ICB to overcome resistance in non-responders.