Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemotherapy in resectable NSCLC reports resection and response rates

Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemotherapy in resectable NSCLC reports…
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that resection and response rates are reported, but definitive benefit remains uncertain.

This is a single-arm meta-analysis that synthesized data on neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable stage IIB–IIIB non-small cell lung cancer. The analysis included 1,885 patients and focused on surgical and pathological outcomes, without a comparator arm. The authors synthesized rates of resection, response, and adverse events across the included studies.

The main results show a surgical resection rate of 76.0% (95% CI: 70.0%−82.0%) and an R0 resection rate of 100% (95% CI: 99%−100%). The pathological complete response rate was 35.9% (95% CI: 30.7%−41.0%), and the major pathological response rate was 25% (95% CI: 21%−29%). The combined rate of pCR and mPR was 60.2% (95% CI: 55.1%−65.4%).

Safety findings included an incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events of 9.0% (95% CI: 5.0%−14.0%) and a rate of surgical complications of 8.0% (95% CI: 3.0%−15.0%). The authors describe tolerability as acceptable based on these rates.

The authors highlight key limitations, including a lack of mature long-term survival outcomes and the absence of comparator data. They conclude that this meta-analysis provides preliminary evidence and a rationale for initiating randomized controlled trials, while stating that definitive clinical benefit remains uncertain. Practice relevance is restrained to trial planning rather than definitive treatment recommendations.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundPotentially resectable, stage IIB–IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge. Factors such as tumor size, location, or nodal status often preclude initial complete resection, necessitating novel strategies to improve prognosis. While neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has demonstrated promise in metastatic/advanced NSCLC, evidence for its application in the potentially resectable setting remains limited. This study synthesizes the existing evidence and evaluates the efficacy, pathological response rates, and frequency of treatment-related events associated with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in this specific patient population.MethodsA single-arm meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)-NMA guidelines. A systematic search of databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane) was performed up to 9 December 2025, for studies investigating neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy combined with chemotherapy in potentially resectable NSCLC. Data were analyzed using STATA 14. A random-effects model was employed for significant heterogeneity (I2 > 50%); otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used. Sensitivity analyses, Begg’s test/Egger’s test, and the trim-and-fill method were applied to assess bias.ResultsA total of 34 studies involving 1,885 patients were included. The pooled surgical resection rate was 76.0% (95% CI: 70.0%−82.0%; I2 = 89.34%). The R0 resection rate was 100% (95% CI: 99%−100%; I2 = 0.00%). The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 35.9% (95% CI: 30.7%−41.0%; I2 = 13.94%), and the major pathological response (mPR) rate was 25% (95% CI: 21%−29%). The combined rate of pCR and mPR was 60.2% (95% CI: 55.1%−65.4%; I2 = 65.70%). The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) was 9.0% (95% CI: 5.0%−14.0%; I2 = 82.05%), and the rate of surgical complications was 8.0% (95% CI: 3.0%−15.0%; I2 = 82.37%). Sensitivity analyses and the trim-and-fill method supported the robustness of the results, with no significant publication bias detected.ConclusionThis single-arm meta-analysis suggests that for patients with potentially resectable NSCLC, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy followed by surgery shows promising short-term pathological response rates and acceptable rates of treatment-related events, indicating potential feasibility. However, because of the lack of comparator data and mature long-term survival outcomes, its definitive clinical benefit remains uncertain. Our results provide preliminary evidence and rationale for initiating randomized controlled clinical trials in this population to compare the efficacy and safety of surgery after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy versus current standard therapy.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024579329.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.