Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemotherapy in resectable NSCLC reports resection and response ratesCombining checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy helps more lung cancer patients get surgery safely

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider that resection and response rates are reported, but definitive benefit remains uncertain.

This is a single-arm meta-analysis that synthesized data on neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable stage IIB–IIIB non-small cell lung cancer. The analysis included 1,885 patients and focused on surgical and pathological outcomes, without a comparator arm. The authors synthesized rates of resection, response, and adverse events across the included studies.

The main results show a surgical resection rate of 76.0% (95% CI: 70.0%−82.0%) and an R0 resection rate of 100% (95% CI: 99%−100%). The pathological complete response rate was 35.9% (95% CI: 30.7%−41.0%), and the major pathological response rate was 25% (95% CI: 21%−29%). The combined rate of pCR and mPR was 60.2% (95% CI: 55.1%−65.4%).

Safety findings included an incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events of 9.0% (95% CI: 5.0%−14.0%) and a rate of surgical complications of 8.0% (95% CI: 3.0%−15.0%). The authors describe tolerability as acceptable based on these rates.

The authors highlight key limitations, including a lack of mature long-term survival outcomes and the absence of comparator data. They conclude that this meta-analysis provides preliminary evidence and a rationale for initiating randomized controlled trials, while stating that definitive clinical benefit remains uncertain. Practice relevance is restrained to trial planning rather than definitive treatment recommendations.

Doctors reviewed data from nearly 1,900 people with a common form of lung cancer. These patients received a mix of drugs that block immune checkpoints and standard chemotherapy before their planned surgery. The goal was to shrink tumors so surgeons could remove them completely.

Results showed that about three quarters of patients were able to have the surgery. In fact, every single patient in the study group had a clean operation where all visible cancer was removed. This is a very important step toward a better cure.

Looking inside the removed tissue, doctors found that about 36% of patients had no cancer cells left at all. Another 25% had a major reduction in cancer cells. Together, these good outcomes happened in over 60% of cases. Most side effects were mild and did not stop patients from finishing their treatment.

Because there was no direct comparison group in this review, doctors cannot say for sure if this treatment is better than other options yet. However, these results give strong reasons to start more formal tests to see if this approach truly helps patients live longer.

What this means for you:
Combining immune drugs with chemo helps many lung cancer patients get surgery with clean results and manageable side effects.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundPotentially resectable, stage IIB–IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge. Factors such as tumor size, location, or nodal status often preclude initial complete resection, necessitating novel strategies to improve prognosis. While neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has demonstrated promise in metastatic/advanced NSCLC, evidence for its application in the potentially resectable setting remains limited. This study synthesizes the existing evidence and evaluates the efficacy, pathological response rates, and frequency of treatment-related events associated with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in this specific patient population.MethodsA single-arm meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)-NMA guidelines. A systematic search of databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane) was performed up to 9 December 2025, for studies investigating neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy combined with chemotherapy in potentially resectable NSCLC. Data were analyzed using STATA 14. A random-effects model was employed for significant heterogeneity (I2 > 50%); otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used. Sensitivity analyses, Begg’s test/Egger’s test, and the trim-and-fill method were applied to assess bias.ResultsA total of 34 studies involving 1,885 patients were included. The pooled surgical resection rate was 76.0% (95% CI: 70.0%−82.0%; I2 = 89.34%). The R0 resection rate was 100% (95% CI: 99%−100%; I2 = 0.00%). The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 35.9% (95% CI: 30.7%−41.0%; I2 = 13.94%), and the major pathological response (mPR) rate was 25% (95% CI: 21%−29%). The combined rate of pCR and mPR was 60.2% (95% CI: 55.1%−65.4%; I2 = 65.70%). The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) was 9.0% (95% CI: 5.0%−14.0%; I2 = 82.05%), and the rate of surgical complications was 8.0% (95% CI: 3.0%−15.0%; I2 = 82.37%). Sensitivity analyses and the trim-and-fill method supported the robustness of the results, with no significant publication bias detected.ConclusionThis single-arm meta-analysis suggests that for patients with potentially resectable NSCLC, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy followed by surgery shows promising short-term pathological response rates and acceptable rates of treatment-related events, indicating potential feasibility. However, because of the lack of comparator data and mature long-term survival outcomes, its definitive clinical benefit remains uncertain. Our results provide preliminary evidence and rationale for initiating randomized controlled clinical trials in this population to compare the efficacy and safety of surgery after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy versus current standard therapy.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024579329.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.