Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Simulation-based training improves fundus identification success in ophthalmology education

Simulation-based training improves fundus identification success in ophthalmology education
Photo by John Kane / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider simulation-based training for ophthalmology curricula to improve fundus identification skills, but interpret results cautiously due to limited evidence.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of simulation-based training compared to traditional training methods for teaching fundus examination. The analysis included 772 participants across simulated settings. The primary outcome was the successful fundus identification rate, with secondary outcomes including simulation favorability, posttest results, and perceived benefits.

Pooled results showed that 63.1% of participants correctly identified fundus structures after simulation-based training. Additionally, 75.6% of participants preferred simulation over traditional training methods. These findings suggest that simulation may enhance learning outcomes in ophthalmology education.

However, the authors note important limitations, including limited study numbers and heterogeneity in how outcomes were assessed. Adverse events were not reported, and funding sources were not disclosed. The certainty of the evidence is limited, and interpretation of fundus identification outcomes should be cautious.

Despite these caveats, the review supports the integration of simulation-based training into ophthalmology curricula to enhance training outcomes. Further research with standardized assessments and larger sample sizes is needed to confirm these findings.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 772
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of simulation-based training for direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy. The primary outcome was successful fundus identification rate. Secondary outcomes included the simulation favorability rate, posttest results, and perceived benefits. Of the 955 studies identified, 11 studies were included, comprising a total sample of 772 participants. Simulation training improved fundus identification success, with 63.1% of participants correctly identifying fundus structures and demonstrated a high favorability rate, with 75.6% of participants preferring simulation over traditional training methods. Participants also demonstrated improvements in posttest knowledge and technical skills, with enhanced confidence, realism, and ease of learning, underscoring simulation's role in effectively advancing practical ophthalmic skills. Overall, simulation-based training seems effective in enhancing examination skills within simulated settings. These findings support its integration into ophthalmology curricula to enhance training outcomes. Interpretation of fundus identification outcomes should be cautious due to limited study numbers and assessment heterogeneity.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.