Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and DEXi show superior CMT reduction in retinitis pigmentosa macular oedemaNew Analysis Compares Treatments for Retinitis Pigmentosa Macular Oedema

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that CAIs and DEXi offer superior long-term anatomical benefits for RP-associated macular oedema despite limited BCVA gains.

This network meta-analysis evaluates multiple treatment modalities for patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP)-associated macular oedema, including carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs), dexamethasone implants (DEXi), and anti-VEGF therapies. The study aimed to compare anatomical outcomes like central macular thickness (CMT) and functional outcomes such as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

At 3 to 4 months, oral CAIs showed greater BCVA improvement compared with anti-VEGF therapies. However, at the 12-month mark, no intervention demonstrated statistically significant superiority for BCVA. Regarding anatomical outcomes, DEXi, acetazolamide, methazolamide, and dorzolamide outperformed anti-VEGF therapies, IVTA, STTA, and UCMSC in reducing CMT at 3 to 4 months. Specific comparisons at 12 months showed significantly greater CMT reduction for dorzolamide versus acetazolamide (-169.50 μm; 95% CI -331.83 to -7.17) and methazolamide (-185.49 μm; 95% CI -354.35 to -16.63), as well as for DEXi versus acetazolamide (-147.00 μm; 95% CI -206.58 to -87.42) and methazolamide (-162.99 μm; 95% CI -238.56 to -87.42).

The authors note that the evidence is limited by a small number of studies and small sample sizes. Clinical application is tempered by the fact that while CAIs and DEXi show superior long-term anatomical benefits, durable BCVA gains remain limited across all available therapies.

How this fits prior evidence

This network meta-analysis addresses a gap in understanding the comparative efficacy of various modalities for retinitis pigmentosa (RP)-associated macular oedema. While previous evidence highlights anti-VEGF plus corticosteroids for improved BCVA and reduced edema in BRVO and CRVO, this study specifically evaluates the role of CAIs and DEXi in RP-associated cases. It identifies that while these interventions provide superior anatomical reduction compared to anti-VEGF therapies, durable functional gains in BCVA are not established.

Researchers analyzed several different treatments to manage macular oedema, which is a type of swelling in the eye associated with retinitis pigmentosa. The study compared various options including oral medications like acetazolamide and methazolamide, topical drops, and steroid implants.

The findings showed that while some treatments were better at reducing physical swelling in the eye over 12 months, they did not show a clear winner for improving long-term vision. Specifically, certain drugs and an implant performed well at reducing thickness early on, but no single treatment was proven to be significantly better than others for lasting vision gains.

Because this analysis relied on a small number of studies and small sample sizes, the results should be viewed with caution. The evidence is not yet strong enough to change standard medical practices. Patients should talk to their eye specialists to determine which treatment plan best fits their specific needs.

What this means for you:
Some treatments reduce eye swelling effectively, but long-term vision improvements vary across different options.

Common questions

Which treatments are best for reducing eye swelling?

At the 3 to 4 month mark, several options including dexamethasone implants and medications like acetazolamide, methazolamide, and dorzolamide were shown to reduce macular thickness effectively. At 12 months, dorzolamide, dexamethasone implants, and acetazolamide showed significant reductions in swelling compared to some other treatments.

Do these treatments improve vision long-term?

While some medications showed better vision improvements than others at 3 to 4 months, no single treatment was shown to be significantly superior for vision at the 12-month mark. Because of small sample sizes in the studies, it is unclear which treatment provides the most lasting benefit for vision.

Is this research enough to change how doctors treat patients?

The findings should be interpreted cautiously because the study included a limited number of reports and small sample sizes. More large-scale trials are needed before these results can significantly change standard medical practices for retinitis pigmentosa.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up4.0 mo
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of current treatments for retinitis pigmentosa (RP)-associated macular oedema using network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Electronic databases were searched for studies reporting changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). A frequentist NMA was performed and treatment hierarchies were estimated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. RESULTS: 12 studies were included to compare the following: oral acetazolamide 500 mg/day, oral methazolamide 50-100 mg/day, topical dorzolamide 2% three times daily, topical ketorolac 0.5% four times daily, intravenous umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UCMSCs; single administration of 3×10⁶ cells), intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEXi) 0.7 mg, intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) 4 mg, sub-Tenon TA (STTA) 20 mg, intravitreal bevacizumab 1.25 mg and intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg. Regarding changes in BCVA at 3-4 months, oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) showed greater BCVA improvement compared with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies; however, no intervention demonstrated statistically significant superiority in BCVA at 12 months. At 3-4 months, DEXi, acetazolamide, methazolamide and dorzolamide demonstrated comparable CMT reduction and outperformed anti-VEGF therapies, IVTA, STTA, intravenous UCMSC and control. By 12 months, dorzolamide (vs acetazolamide: -169.50 µm (95% CI -331.83 to -7.17) and vs methazolamide: -185.49 µm (95% CI -354.35 to -16.63)) and DEXi (vs acetazolamide: -147.00 µm (95% CI -206.58 to -87.42) and vs methazolamide: -162.99 µm (95% CI -238.56 to -87.42)) provided significantly greater CMT reduction than acetazolamide and methazolamide. CONCLUSIONS: CAIs and DEXi demonstrated the greatest long-term anatomical benefit for RP-associated macular oedema, whereas durable BCVA gains remained limited across available therapies. While oral and topical CAIs showed comparable short-term efficacy, topical dorzolamide and DEXi provided greater long-term CMT reduction than oral CAIs. Given the limited number of studies and small sample sizes, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and validated in larger randomised controlled trials.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.