Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Anti-VEGF plus corticosteroids improves BCVA and reduces edema recurrence in BRVO and CRVOCombination therapy improves vision for patients with retinal vein occlusion

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider anti-VEGF plus corticosteroid therapy for improved BCVA and reduced edema, while monitoring for IOP elevation.

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of anti-VEGF plus corticosteroid combination therapy versus anti-VEGF monotherapy in patients with macular edema from branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). The study included a total of 2040 patients to assess primary outcomes such as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and secondary outcomes including central macular thickness (CMT), edema recurrence, and the need for PRN anti-VEGF injections.

Key findings indicate that combination therapy significantly improved BCVA (MD -0.09; 95% CI -0.12 to -0.07; p < 0.00001) and reduced CMT (MD -24.42; 95% CI -35.32 to -13.52; p < 0.0001). Additionally, patients receiving combination therapy showed a lower rate of edema recurrence (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.30-0.80; p = 0.004) and a reduced need for PRN anti-VEGF injections (OR 6.77; 95% CI 3.41-13.46; p < 0.00001).

However, the combination therapy was associated with higher intraocular pressure (MD 0.64; 95% CI 0.20-1.07; p = 0.004) and an increased risk of cataract surgery (OR 7.95; 95% CI 1.35-46.75; p = 0.02). The authors note that while combination therapy may reduce injection frequency, this does not necessarily translate to lower overall treatment burden or costs due to the necessity of monitoring for steroid-related complications.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in optimizing treatment for macular edema from BRVO and CRVO. While previous coverage has discussed corticosteroid exposure in SLE and its association with higher mortality, this finding specifically evaluates the role of corticosteroids as an adjunct to anti-VEGF therapy in retinal vein occlusions. The results confirm that combination therapy improves efficacy outcomes like BCVA and reduces recurrence but introduces specific risks such as increased intraocular pressure.

Living with a blocked blood vessel in the eye, known as a retinal vein occlusion, can threaten your sight. For many patients, managing swelling in the macula is the primary goal to keep their vision clear. A large review of data from over 2,000 patients looked at whether combining anti-VEGF drugs with corticosteroids works better than using anti-VEGF drugs alone.

The results showed that the combination therapy led to better visual acuity and thinner swelling in the macula compared to single-drug treatment. Patients receiving the combination also saw a significant drop in the number of extra injections needed over a six-month period. However, this approach comes with specific trade-offs. The study found that patients on the combined treatment had higher eye pressure and an increased risk of needing cataract surgery.

While the combination therapy offers better results for vision and fewer injections, it is not a perfect fix for everyone. Because of the risks involving eye pressure and cataracts, doctors must weigh these benefits against potential complications. The study also noted that while patients might need fewer injections, they may still require frequent monitoring to manage side effects from the steroids.

What this means for you:
Combining anti-VEGF drugs with corticosteroids improves vision but increases risks like higher eye pressure.

Common questions

Does the combination treatment actually improve my vision?

Yes, the study found that patients receiving both anti-VEGF drugs and corticosteroids had better best-corrected visual acuity compared to those receiving only anti-VEGF drugs. It also helped reduce the thickness of swelling in the macula.

Will I need fewer injections with this treatment?

The data showed a significant reduction in the need for extra, as-needed anti-VEGF injections when patients received the combination therapy. This was observed over a six-month follow-up period.

Are there any risks to using both medications together?

There are some risks. Patients receiving the combination therapy showed higher intraocular pressure (eye pressure) and an increased risk of needing cataract surgery compared to those on single-drug treatment.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 2,040
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up6.0 mo
PublishedJan 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
We evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and corticosteroid combination therapy versus anti-VEGF monotherapy for both branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO)-related macular edema. A systematic search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the 2 modalities. Non-RCTs, studies with steroid monotherapy as the only comparator and macular edema from other causes were excluded. Visual, anatomical, safety, and injection-related outcomes were assessed. Twenty RCTs comprising 2040 patients were included. Combination therapy showed better best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (Mean Difference [MD] -0.09; 95 % CI -0.12 to -0.07; p < 0.00001), reduced central macular thickness (CMT) (MD -24.42; 95 % CI -35.32 to -13.52; p < 0.0001), lower edema recurrence (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.49; 95 % CI 0.30-0.80; p = 0.004), reduced need for PRN anti-VEGF injections (OR 6.77; 95 % CI 3.41-13.46; p < 0.00001), higher intraocular pressure (IOP) within normal range up to 6 months (MD 0.64; 95 % CI 0.20-1.07; p = 0.004) and increased cataract surgery risk (OR 7.95; 95 % CI 1.35-46.75; p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis showed BCVA improvement, fewer injections, reduced PRN need, and higher IOP in CRVO, and reduced recurrence in BRVO. Triamcinolone acetonide improved BCVA while intravitreal dexamethasone implant lowered CMT, and both agents reduced PRN injections. Combination therapy provides modest improvement in efficacy outcomes and fewer injections, particularly in CRVO, but increases risk of IOP elevation and cataract surgery. Reduced injection frequency may not necessarily translate to overall lower treatment burden and costs due to frequent monitoring of steroid-related complications.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.