Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

CVC catheters reduce puncture site leakage versus CPNB catheters for fascia iliaca block in elderly hip fracture surgeryFor hip fracture pain relief, does the catheter type matter for leakage?

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note: CVC catheters linked to less leakage than CPNB catheters, but no difference in pain relief was found.

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 64 elderly patients (aged 60-75 years, ASA class I-III) scheduled for intramedullary nail fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. It compared two catheter types for continuous fascia iliaca compartment block analgesia: single-lumen central venous catheters (CVCs) versus continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB) catheters. The primary outcome was the incidence and extent of puncture site leakage assessed 48 hours postoperatively.

The main results showed a significant reduction in leakage with CVCs. The incidence of puncture site leakage was 16.1% in the CVC group compared to 96.8% in the CPNB group (P < .001). The mean leakage area was also significantly smaller in the CVC group (0.61 ± 0.46 cm) versus the CPNB group (19.30 ± 4.64 cm, P < .001). However, the study found no significant differences in postoperative analgesic efficacy, as measured by visual analog scale pain scores at 6, 24, and 48 hours, or in other secondary outcomes including block success rate.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include the short 48-hour follow-up period and the lack of reported data on analgesic efficacy differences. The study did not find that reduced leakage translated to improved pain control. For practice, this evidence suggests CVCs may be associated with less local anesthetic leakage at the catheter site, but clinicians should note this did not correlate with better analgesia in this short-term study.

After a hip fracture repair, managing pain is crucial for recovery. Doctors often use a continuous nerve block, where a tiny catheter delivers numbing medicine near the nerves. But sometimes, the medicine can leak out around the catheter site, which can be messy and might affect how well the pain relief works.

Researchers wanted to see if using a different type of catheter could reduce this leakage. They compared two types in 64 older adults who had surgery for a hip fracture. One group got a standard peripheral nerve block catheter. The other got a single-lumen central venous catheter, which is a type often used for other medical procedures. The main finding was clear: the central venous catheters leaked much less. Only about 16% of patients with that catheter had any leakage, compared to nearly 97% with the standard catheter. The area of leakage was also dramatically smaller.

Importantly, both methods provided the same level of pain relief in the first 48 hours after surgery. The study didn't report on safety issues or side effects. This is a promising technical finding about reducing leakage, but it's from a single, small study with very short-term follow-up. We don't yet know if less leakage leads to any practical benefits for patients beyond a cleaner bandage.

What this means for you:
One catheter type leaked far less after hip surgery, but pain relief was the same.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up900.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: To compare the incidence of puncture site leakage and postoperative analgesia between single-lumen central venous catheter (CVC) and continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB) catheter for continuous fascia iliaca compartment block analgesia in elderly patients with hip fractures. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, parallel-group controlled trial. METHODS: Sixty-four elderly participants (aged 60-75 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists class I-III) scheduled for intramedullary nail internal fixation (PFNA) of femoral intertrochanteric fractures were randomly allocated to two groups: CVC group and Continuous Peripheral Nerver Block catheter (CPNB group). In all patients, the continuous block catheter was inserted into the fascia iliaca compartment above the inguinal ligament under the guidance of ultrasound, and the postoperative analgesic pump was used. Patients in both groups underwent treatment with an ultrasound-guided in-plane approach to the fascia iliaca space via the inguinal ligament, along with the use of a postoperative analgesia pump. The degree of leakage from the two types of catheters was assessed 48 hours postoperatively, with the severity of leakage at the puncture site being qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated based on the color change of a medical-surgical film containing iodophor Secondary outcomes included the time required for puncture and catheterization, visual analog scale pain scores at 6, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, the success rate of lower limb nerve block, and the incidence of adverse reactions to nerve block. FINDINGS: In comparison with the CPNB group, the CVC group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of puncture site leakage (96.8% vs 16.1%, P < .001) and a smaller leakage area (19.30 ± 4.64 cm vs 0.61 ± 0.46 cm, P < .001). However, no significant differences were observed in postoperative analgesic efficacy or other secondary outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with hip fractures, using CVCs for postoperative analgesia is associated with a reduced incidence and extent of leakage at the puncture site during continuous fascia iliaca compartment block.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.