Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Current research on talent identification in Para athletics focuses primarily on physical testing and sprintingMapping how coaches find and develop talent in Para athletics

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that current TIdD research in Para athletics is heavily weighted toward sprinting and physical testing data.

This scoping review maps the current research landscape regarding talent identification and development (TIdD) practices specifically within Para athletics. The authors synthesized evidence from 9 papers identified from an initial pool of 1,786 results to identify common assessment types and frequently investigated disciplines.

Key findings indicate that TIdD practices are primarily centered on physical assessments and the analysis of demographic data, such as birthdates and impairment-related factors. Among the included research, sprinting was identified as the most investigated discipline. Furthermore, 5 out of 9 papers were published within the last 5 years, while only 4 out of 9 papers reported specific physical testing data.

The authors note a significant limitation in the current literature: there is a notable absence of representation for several classifications. While the review aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for practitioners, the limited scope and lack of diversity in represented categories suggest that current research may not fully capture the breadth of Para athletics talent development.

Finding the next generation of stars in para athletics is a complex task. Coaches and scouts need clear ways to identify young athletes who have both the physical ability and the drive to compete at high levels. This review looks at how talent identification and development currently works across different disciplines.

Out of over 1,700 search results, researchers found that only nine papers provided specific details on these practices. Most of this research is recent, with five of those nine papers published in the last five years. The study shows that current methods lean heavily on physical testing and looking at demographic data, such as birthdates and factors related to an athlete's impairment.

While sprinting is the most researched area, there is still a lot of missing information. The review notes a lack of research for several different classifications. This means while we have some clues on how to find talent, many types of para athletes are not yet well represented in current studies.

What this means for you:
Current talent identification in para athletics relies mostly on physical tests and demographic data.

Common questions

What methods are currently used to find talent in para sports?

Current practices focus primarily on physical assessments and the analysis of demographic data. This includes looking at factors like birthdates and specific impairment-related factors to identify potential athletes.

Which sports get the most attention in these studies?

Sprinting is currently the most investigated discipline when it comes to research on talent identification and development for para athletics.

Is there enough research covering all types of para athletes?

Not yet. The study found a notable absence of representation for several classifications, meaning many types of para athletes are not fully covered by current research.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
The ability to identify and develop talented athletes effectively can increase the likelihood of sporting success and thus increase returns on invested resources for stakeholders. Talent identification and development (TIdD) is well studied in sports which are highly monetised, such as soccer and rugby, however, it is less researched in Para sport. The purpose of this scoping review is to synthesise and map the current landscape of research on TIdD in Para athletics (PA) to allow for evidence-based recommendations to be made for applied practice. This study followed a five-step framework for conducting scoping reviews and searched five major databases [PubMed, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO (via EBSCO), ERIC (via ProQuest), and SCOPUS (via Elsevier)], reference lists and existing networks, relevant organisations and conferences, for research pertaining to TIdD in PA. The search returned 1,786 results, of which, nine papers were included in this review. Of the nine publications related to TIdD in PA, five were published within the last 5 years, and four reported on physical testing data. The most investigated track and field discipline was sprinting and there was a notable absence of representation for several classifications. The review found that TIdD practices in PA are primarily centered on physical assessments and the analysis of demographic data, including birthdates and impairment-related factors. Further research is needed in this area, with research teams encouraged to give greater attention to diversity and critically reflect on the broader applicability of their findings.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.