Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Delphi consensus among Italian thoracic surgeons addresses bleeding management and VIBeS scale use

Delphi consensus among Italian thoracic surgeons addresses bleeding management and VIBeS scale use
Photo by Ivan Oštrić / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note this consensus may reduce practice variation in thoracic surgery bleeding, though randomized data are absent.

This Delphi consensus report gathered input from 60 Italian thoracic surgeons invited, with 49 participants completing the process. The study aimed to establish national consensus among Italian thoracic surgeons regarding bleeding in thoracic surgery (BTS). The setting was a national consensus among Italian thoracic surgeons. The population consisted of Italian thoracic surgeons. The intervention included evaluation of factors and management.

The Delphi process evaluated influencing factors, use of a validated intraoperative bleeding scale (VIBeS), and management strategies. The process was conducted nationally. Consensus was reached on 35 out of 39 issues, representing 89.7% agreement. Responders agreed that medical and surgical factors influenced BTS with >90% agreement.

Use of VIBeS gained broad positive acceptance with >90% agreement. Broad positive consensus existed for intraoperative and post-operative effects with >73% agreement regarding surgeon stress, overall costs, length of operation, and postoperative complications. Broad positive consensus was also noted on modality of reduction and management of BTS.

Limitations include the absence of prospective and randomized studies on management of BTS. This document may be useful for reducing practice variation among thoracic surgeons facing intraoperative bleeding. Safety data were not reported in this consensus document. Clinicians must recognize this is consensus-based and not evidence from randomized studies.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionWe report the results of a national consensus paper among Italian thoracic surgeons obtained through a Delphi process, on the bleeding in thoracic surgery (BTS) evaluating influencing factors, use of a validated intraoperative bleeding scale (VIBeS), its management and helping improving practice.MethodsA panel of 20 statements (a total of 39 issues) was developed and, after initial validation by six experts, was electronically sent to 60 Italian thoracic surgeons. Participants were asked to score each statement on a 5-point Likert scale and the agreement was scored for evaluating the consensus (>66%).ResultsOverall, a total of 49 (82%) participants scored the proposed statements. The consensus was reached in 35/39 issues (89.7%). Responders agreed (>90%) that medical (comorbidities, anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies) and surgical factors (pleural adhesions, procedures on parietal pleura and chest wall resection) influenced BTS. Use of VIBeS has gained broad positive acceptance (>90%). Effects of BTS have achieved a broad positive consensus both for intraoperative and post-operative ones (surgeon stress, overall costs, length of operation, postoperative complications) (>73%). Modality of reduction and management of BTS (use of appropriate hemostatic products according to the coagulation status and VIBeS) has obtained a broad positive consensus.ConclusionsThe expert panel of Italian thoracic surgeons reached an agreement on the majority of issues of Delphi survey (factors, effects and management of BTS). The use of a VIBeS is recommended. In the absence of prospective and randomized studies on management of BTS, this document may be useful for reducing practice variation among thoracic surgeons facing intraoperative bleeding.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.