Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review and meta-analysis of photobiomodulation for fracture pain and functionLight Therapy Cuts Fracture Pain Within One Week, Study Shows

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider photobiomodulation for short-term pain relief in fractures, but note inconsistent long-term benefits.

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effects of photobiomodulation compared with placebo in patients with fractures. The analysis included 12 studies in the systematic review and 9 studies in the meta-analysis. Follow-up periods ranged from one week to 26 weeks. The primary outcome was pain score, and secondary outcomes included functional improvement, healing, grip strength, bone healing, and mandibular functional recovery.

The meta-analysis found that one-week pain scores were lower in the photobiomodulation group than in the placebo group, with a mean difference of -0.74 and a 95% CI of -1.00, -0.47. Grip strength at four weeks was significantly greater in the photobiomodulation group, with a mean difference of 5.03 and a 95% CI of 4.29, 5.78. No significant differences were observed for pain and functional scores between four and 26 weeks, nor for bone healing.

Evidence for mandibular functional recovery and bone healing remains inconsistent. The authors suggest that future studies should determine therapeutic parameters and their impact on bone healing and long-term functional outcomes across fracture types. Funding or conflicts of interest were not reported. No side effects were reported in the included studies.

Practice relevance suggests that photobiomodulation may relieve short-term pain in fractures and improve grip strength in patients with upper limb fractures. However, the analysis does not show significant long-term benefits for pain, function, or bone healing.

The Pain That Slows Everything Down

Imagine breaking your wrist. The pain is sharp, constant, and exhausting. But here's what many people don't realize: that pain does more than hurt. It stops you from moving. And when you cannot move after a fracture, your recovery takes longer.

This is the frustrating cycle that doctors have struggled with for years. Pain keeps patients from doing their rehab exercises. Skipping rehab means weaker muscles and slower healing. And the whole process drags on.

Now a new analysis of 12 clinical trials suggests there might be a simple, drug-free way to break that cycle. The tool is light. Not just any light, but specific wavelengths aimed directly at the injury.

What Changed in One Week

The old way of thinking about fracture pain was straightforward. You take painkillers. You rest. You wait. But painkillers come with side effects like drowsiness, stomach problems, and the risk of dependency.

Here's the twist. This new research shows that photobiomodulation (PBM for short) can lower pain scores within just seven days. That is faster than many people expect from a non-drug treatment.

PBM is not a laser that cuts or burns. It is a low-level light that penetrates the skin and reaches the tissues underneath. Think of it like sunlight for your cells, but with a very specific color and intensity.

How Light Talks to Your Cells

Your cells have tiny structures called mitochondria. These are the power plants of your cells. They produce energy that keeps everything running.

When a bone breaks, the cells around the injury become stressed. They cannot make energy as well. This slows down healing and keeps pain signals firing.

PBM works like a jumpstart. The light energy is absorbed by the mitochondria. This helps them produce more energy. With more energy, cells can repair themselves faster and reduce inflammation.

Think of it like this. If your phone battery is at 2 percent, nothing works well. PBM is like plugging your cells into a charger. They start functioning again. Pain signals quiet down. Healing can begin.

Researchers from China pulled together data from 12 randomized controlled trials. These are the gold standard of medical research. In total, hundreds of fracture patients were studied.

Some patients received real PBM treatment. Others received a fake treatment that looked the same but did nothing. Neither the patients nor the doctors knew who got which.

The results were clear. After one week, the PBM group reported significantly less pain than the placebo group. The difference was large enough to matter in real life. Patients could move more comfortably.

For people with upper limb fractures like broken wrists or arms, grip strength improved dramatically at four weeks. This is important because grip strength is a sign that someone is recovering and can return to daily activities.

But There's a Catch

The benefits did not last forever. At four weeks and beyond, the pain scores between the two groups evened out. PBM did not show long-term advantages over placebo.

Bone healing itself did not improve either. The light helped with pain and function in the short term, but it did not make bones knit together faster.

This matters because some clinics already offer PBM therapy. Patients might expect it to speed up their full recovery. The evidence says that is not the case yet.

If you break a bone, should you ask your doctor about light therapy? The honest answer is maybe.

PBM appears safe. None of the studies reported side effects. It is non-invasive and painless. For short-term pain relief in the first week after a fracture, it seems to work.

But here is the reality. PBM is not widely available in most hospitals or clinics. The devices are expensive. Insurance rarely covers them. And the treatment protocols vary widely between studies.

This does not mean this treatment is available at your local clinic tomorrow.

Doctors need more research to know exactly which light wavelength to use, how long to apply it, and which fractures respond best.

The Limits of This Research

This analysis combined data from 12 studies, but only 9 had the right data for the main pain analysis. That is a modest number.

The studies used different types of light devices and different treatment schedules. Some shined light on the fracture site itself. Others aimed at acupuncture points on the body. Both approaches worked, but this makes it hard to give one clear recommendation.

Most of the studies followed patients for only a few weeks. Long-term data is missing. And the research did not cover all types of fractures equally.

What Happens Next

The researchers call for larger studies that test specific light doses and wavelengths. They want to know if PBM can eventually improve bone healing, not just pain.

Future trials will need to follow patients for months, not weeks. They will need to compare PBM against standard pain treatments. And they will need to figure out which fracture types benefit most.

For now, PBM is a promising tool for the early days after a fracture. It is not a replacement for pain medication or physical therapy. But it could become a helpful addition to the recovery toolkit.

Research like this takes time. Each study builds on the last. The goal is clear: help people heal from fractures with less pain and faster recovery. Light therapy may be one piece of that puzzle.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedDec 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
INTRODUCTION: Fractures, the most common type of trauma, can cause considerable distress to patients. Pain can not only affect the comfort of fracture patients but also delay their participation in rehabilitation training. Photobiomodulation (PBM) has been associated with pain reduction and the promotion of tissue healing. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PBM in reducing pain and promoting rehabilitation in patients with fractures. METHODS: This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024591373). We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science for RCTs that investigated PBM in fractures as of August 2025. The primary outcome was the pain score. The secondary outcomes included functional and healing. RESULT: Finally, 12 and 9 studies were ultimately included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, respectively. The pooled analysis showed that the one-week pain score was lower in the PBM group than in the placebo group (MD -0.74, 95% CI -1.00, -0.47,  < 0.0001, I = 0%). Subgroup analysis showed that the difference between the two groups was statistically significant regardless of fracture site or acupoint irradiation. Changes in pain scores were statistically significant in both groups at different wavelength combinations. The improvement in grip strength at 4 weeks was significantly greater in PBM than in placebo (MD 5.03, 95% CI 4.29, 5.78;  < 0.0001; I = 0%). There were no significant differences in pain and functional scores at 4-26 weeks. Bone healing did not show differences between the two groups. No side effects reported. CONCLUSION: PBM appears to relieve short-term pain in fractures and improve grip strength in patients with upper limb fractures, but does not show significant long-term benefits. Evidence for mandibular functional recovery and bone healing remains inconsistent. Future studies should determine therapeutic parameters and their impact on bone healing and long-term functional outcomes across fracture types.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.