When it comes to teaching busy primary care teams about sensitive topics like palliative care, what's the best way to do it online? A new study listened to 42 different primary care teams who went through a virtual training program called CAPACITI. The teams took part in focus groups to talk about their experiences with two different learning styles: one where they worked through material on their own, and another where a facilitator guided them. The big takeaway? Both styles were seen as effective. Teams reported that the training led to changes in their thinking and their behavior when caring for patients. Interestingly, there wasn't a strong preference for one style over the other. This is important because it means training programs might have more flexibility in how they're designed. However, it's crucial to remember what this study is—and isn't. It's a qualitative look at people's perceptions. The results come from what teams said in conversations, not from tracking specific patient outcomes. Also, only about a quarter of the teams had tried both learning styles, so the comparison isn't complete. No safety issues with the training were reported. The findings offer a useful snapshot of what works for learners, but they don't tell us which method ultimately leads to better care for patients.
How do doctors learn best? Two online teaching styles both help with palliative care.
Photo by Markus Winkler / Unsplash
What this means for you:
For teaching palliative care online, both solo and guided learning can work, based on what doctors said.