Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Interrupted suturing shows no significant difference from continuous suturing in TIP urethroplasty for hypospadiasSuturing technique does not affect hypospadias surgery outcomes

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that interrupted and continuous suturing techniques show comparable outcomes in TIP urethroplasty for hypospadias.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of interrupted versus continuous suturing techniques during tubularised incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty for patients with hypospadias. The analysis pooled data from 2,625 patients to compare primary outcomes including urethrocutaneous fistula, surgical site infection, meatal stenosis, urethral stricture, and glans dehiscence.

The meta-analysis found no statistically significant differences between interrupted (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.38-1.11) and continuous suturing for urethrocutaneous fistula or surgical site infection (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.25-1.48). Similarly, no significant differences were observed for meatal stenosis (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.54-1.80), urethral stricture (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.29-3.97), or glans dehiscence (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.36-1.63). Regarding operative time, the mean difference was 3.77 minutes (95% CI -3.69 to 11.24), which was not clinically meaningful.

The authors noted that while both techniques show comparable outcomes for complications and operative times, there is a need for large, well-designed multicentre randomised trials to further inform clinical practice. Currently, the choice of suturing technique may be based on surgeon preference and experience as neither method demonstrated superior safety or efficacy in this meta-analysis.

A new analysis of 14 studies involving 2,625 boys who had hypospadias repair surgery found that the way surgeons stitch the urethra does not change the risk of complications. The study compared interrupted suturing (taking separate stitches) with continuous suturing (one long stitch).

Researchers looked at outcomes like fistulas, infections, narrowing, and wound separation. None of these complications showed a statistically significant difference between the two techniques. The only difference was a slightly longer operative time with interrupted suturing, but the average difference was less than 4 minutes and not considered clinically meaningful.

The analysis included both observational studies and randomized trials, which strengthens the findings. However, the authors note that larger, well-designed multicenter trials are still needed to confirm these results.

For parents and surgeons, this means that the choice of suturing technique can be based on surgeon preference and experience. Both methods appear to be equally safe and effective for boys undergoing this common surgery.

What this means for you:
Interrupted and continuous suturing have similar complication rates in hypospadias repair.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: The optimal suturing technique for urethral tubularisation during tubularised incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared perioperative and postoperative outcomes of interrupted versus continuous suturing techniques in paediatric hypospadias repair. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to December 2025 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Randomised controlled trials and observational studies comparing interrupted and continuous suturing during paediatric TIP urethroplasty were included. Outcomes assessed were urethrocutaneous fistula, surgical site infection, meatal stenosis, urethral stricture, glans dehiscence, overall complications, urinary stream outcomes, operative time, and reoperation rates. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool and the ROBINS-I. A random-effects meta-analysis supplemented by influence diagnostics and Hartung-Knapp adjustment for heterogeneous outcomes, were conducted using R version 4.5.2, with results expressed as odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Fifteen studies involving 2625 paediatric patients were included, with 800 undergoing interrupted suturing and 1,825 continuous suturing. No statistically significant differences were observed between techniques for urethrocutaneous fistula (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.38-1.11), surgical site infection (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.25-1.48), meatal stenosis (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.54-1.80), urethral stricture (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.29-3.97), overall complications (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48-1.17), or glans dehiscence (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.36-1.63). Operating time showed no clinically meaningful difference operative time (MD 3.77 min, 95% CI - 3.69 to 11.24, Hartung-Knapp adjusted). CONCLUSION: Continuous and interrupted suturing techniques during TIP urethroplasty demonstrate comparable complication rates and functional outcomes. These findings suggest that suturing technique may be selected based on surgeon preference and experience; however, large, well-designed multicentre randomised trials are required to further inform clinical practice.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.