OPEP device added to chest physiotherapy improves adherence but not clinical outcomes in children with bronchiectasis
This randomized trial enrolled 42 children with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis to compare an 8-week multicomponent chest physiotherapy program alone versus the same program plus an oscillatory positive expiratory pressure device. The primary outcomes were exercise capacity and dynamic ventilatory responses.
Both groups showed significant improvement in 6-minute walk test distance, change in inspiratory capacity during exertion, lowest SpO2, time spent with a drop of ≥4% in SpO2, FVC%, FEV1%, and PEF%. However, there was no significant difference between groups for any of these clinical outcomes. The CPT + OPEP group had significantly higher program adherence (85 ± 15% vs 74 ± 18%, p < 0.05).
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include the small sample size, short 8-week follow-up, lack of reported effect sizes and confidence intervals, and absence of data on long-term outcomes or clinical events like exacerbations. Funding and conflicts of interest were not reported.
For practice, this single trial suggests that a structured chest physiotherapy program may benefit children with bronchiectasis. The decision to add an OPEP device may be individualized to address engagement or feasibility rather than to achieve further clinical benefit, though this requires confirmation in larger, longer-term studies.