Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Hospital at home reduces length of stay and 30-day readmissions in patients with heart, airway, or respiratory conditions

Hospital at home reduces length of stay and 30-day readmissions in patients with heart, airway, or r…
Photo by Annabel Podevyn / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider HAH for potential bed-day savings and reduced readmissions in eligible patients, but note observational limitations.

This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients admitted to hospital at home (HAH) services or inpatient care in England, focusing on those with heart function, airway disease, or acute respiratory infection. The study included 2,972 HAH episodes, with 1,488 matched inpatient-originated episodes and 754 admission prevention episodes, comparing HAH to matched inpatient controls. Primary outcomes were length of stay and total bed-day costs, with secondary outcomes including 30-day readmission rates, 90-day mortality, and patient experience metrics.

Main results showed HAH reduced length of stay compared with matched inpatient controls, with bed-day savings of 3.13 days (95% CI 2.60–3.67). All-cause 30-day readmission rates were significantly lower in HAH cohorts than in matched controls, with an odds ratio of 0.55 (95% CI 0.42–0.70). Secondary outcomes like 90-day mortality and patient experience metrics were not reported in the input, and safety data including adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were also not reported.

Key limitations were not specified in the input, but as an observational study, it cannot establish causality, and unmeasured confounding may affect results. The findings support wider implementation of HAH for efficiency, but clinicians should interpret these results cautiously due to the retrospective design and lack of safety data.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Hospital at home (HAH) services within the UK have expanded rapidly over the last 5 years, but there is comparatively little evidence demonstrating their clinical effectiveness. In this study, we evaluated the clinical outcomes, safety, and cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive HAH service in England. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to our HAH service between December 2021 and May 2024, including pathways for heart function, airway disease, and acute respiratory infection. A 1:1 propensity score matched control cohort of patients admitted to inpatient care was created, using regression adjustment to derive doubly robust estimates of main outcomes. Primary outcomes included length of stay and total bed-day costs. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission rates, 90-day mortality, and patient experience and acceptability metrics. We analysed 2,972 HAH episodes, yielding, after exclusions, a total of 1,488 inpatient-originated (IP) episodes that were matched 1:1 to controls, as well as 754 admission prevention episodes for a separate analysis. HAH reduced length of stay compared with matched inpatient controls (bed-day savings: 3.13 days, 95% CI 2.60–3.67, p  All-cause 30-day readmission rates were significantly lower in HAH cohorts than in matched controls (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42–0.70, p  This large real-world evaluation demonstrates that HAH services significantly reduce length of stay, readmissions, and healthcare costs while maintaining safety and possibly reducing mortality. These findings support a wider implementation of HAH.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.