Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Melatonin treatment in term or late preterm newborns with neonatal encephalopathy shows very uncertain effects on mortality or disabilityCould Melatonin Protect Newborn Brains? We Still Don't Know

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that evidence for melatonin in neonatal encephalopathy is very uncertain due to limited pilot data.

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effects of melatonin in newborns with neonatal encephalopathy. The population included term or late preterm infants (≥34 weeks gestational age) without major congenital anomalies, totaling 155 participants. Melatonin was administered with or without therapeutic hypothermia, compared to standard care with or without therapeutic hypothermia. Follow-up ranged from discharge to 18 months of life.

The primary outcome was the composite of mortality or neurodevelopmental disability at ≥18 months. Only one pilot study involving 25 participants reported this outcome. Evidence for this critical endpoint is very uncertain. Secondary outcomes included mortality within one month, neurodevelopmental disability, MRI abnormalities, multiorgan dysfunction, and anti-seizure medication use.

For mortality in the first month, the odds ratio was 0.39 (95% CI 0.06 to 2.37) when melatonin and therapeutic hypothermia were compared to standard care with therapeutic hypothermia. In a separate comparison of melatonin monotherapy versus standard care without therapeutic hypothermia, the odds ratio was 0.24 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.69). MRI abnormalities in basal ganglia and thalamus showed an odds ratio of 0.90 (95% CI 0.29 to 2.81), while white matter abnormalities showed an odds ratio of 0.32 (95% CI 0.02 to 6.04). All results were derived from very uncertain evidence.

Safety data, including adverse events and tolerability, were not reported. Key limitations include the reliance on a single pilot study for the primary outcome, a small total sample size, and insufficient sample sizes in included studies. The research was funded by the Health Research Board of Ireland as part of the NEPTuNE Collaboration. Given the very low-certainty evidence, current data do not support definitive clinical recommendations.

A crisis that can reshape a child's life

When a newborn does not get enough oxygen around the time of birth, the brain can be injured. This is called neonatal encephalopathy, or NE.

It affects over a million newborns worldwide each year. Many die. Many survive with lasting disabilities, from cerebral palsy to severe learning problems.

The best tool we have is therapeutic hypothermia, which cools the baby's body just below normal for 72 hours. That cooling slows brain damage. It works, but only partially. And in low-income countries where intensive care is limited, it can even be harmful.

Researchers have been looking for something that could help beyond cooling.

Melatonin, the hormone most people know for sleep, has caught attention as a neuroprotective drug. Lab studies show it reduces inflammation and oxidative damage, two key culprits in brain injury after oxygen deprivation.

Animal models have been encouraging. Pigs, rats, and other species given melatonin after brain oxygen deprivation tend to do better than untreated animals.

The question is whether those results translate to human babies. A Cochrane review aims to be the most rigorous assessment.

Old way vs. new review

Previous smaller reviews hinted that melatonin might help. But they were not systematic, and they did not include the newest trials.

This Cochrane review followed strict methods. It searched all relevant databases through August 2025. It only included randomized controlled trials. It excluded cross-over designs and observational studies, which are less reliable for answering questions about treatment effects.

How it works, in plain English

After oxygen deprivation, a cascade of damage continues for hours or days. The damaged cells release signals that spread inflammation to nearby cells. Free radicals, highly reactive molecules, pile on more injury.

Melatonin is a natural antioxidant. It mops up free radicals. It also calms inflammation. In theory, giving melatonin during the danger window should limit how much of the brain is lost.

Think of it as fire suppression foam. The fire is already lit. You cannot undo what the first flames did. But you can slow the spread so the damaged area stays small.

The study snapshot

The review found only 4 randomized trials meeting the criteria. Together, they included 155 babies.

Two trials compared melatonin plus cooling to cooling alone. Two compared melatonin alone to standard care when cooling was not available, likely in lower-resource settings.

Follow-up varied from discharge to 18 months of age. That is short for neurodevelopmental outcomes but provides some signal.

Here's what they found

The critical outcome, which combined death and neurodevelopmental disability at 18 months, was reported by just one small pilot study of 25 babies. That is nowhere near enough data to draw conclusions.

For mortality in the first month of life, melatonin plus cooling showed a nonsignificant trend toward lower deaths. Melatonin alone without cooling had a stronger signal, with the odds of death reduced. But the certainty of this evidence was rated very low.

MRI brain findings did not differ clearly between groups.

Multiorgan dysfunction and seizure medication use, which the authors wanted to examine, were not reported in any trial.

But here is the catch.

The review's headline finding is not about melatonin working. It is about how little we actually know.

Only 155 total participants across 4 small trials. Pilot studies. Wide confidence intervals. Very low certainty evidence.

Despite years of interest and animal studies, the human evidence base is shockingly thin.

How the researchers read it

The authors are direct. They cannot draw conclusions. They call for larger randomized trials to be done urgently.

They point out that in regions without access to therapeutic hypothermia, melatonin could be especially important if it works. A treatment that is cheap, widely available, and safe would be transformative. But it needs real evidence first.

If you are a parent of a newborn with neonatal encephalopathy, standard care still applies. That means therapeutic hypothermia when available, along with intensive care support.

Melatonin is not currently standard therapy. Do not demand it or try to give supplements to a critically ill newborn on your own. The doses and timing in trials are carefully controlled.

If your baby is in a setting where cooling is not available, ask the medical team about any ongoing trials or research protocols they participate in. Some hospitals are testing melatonin in larger studies.

For expectant parents, good prenatal care remains the best protection against brain injury at birth. Regular checkups, monitoring, and skilled delivery care reduce the risk of oxygen problems.

The limits

The review includes what exists. The problem is what does not exist. Bigger trials are still missing.

The four trials used different doses, timing, and routes of melatonin delivery. That makes combining their results harder.

None of the studies tracked long-term outcomes beyond 18 months. Neurodevelopment continues unfolding throughout childhood, and some effects of early brain injury appear only later.

Larger trials are now being planned in multiple countries. Some focus specifically on settings where cooling is not available. Others test combinations of melatonin with cooling.

Until those trials report out, melatonin remains experimental for neonatal encephalopathy. The potential is real. The proof is not.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 155
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up7.9 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
RATIONALE: Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) affects 1.15 million newborns annually and is associated with a high incidence of mortality and long-term neurodevelopmental disability (NDD). Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is the only proven therapeutic intervention available. However, it is only partially effective, and evidence suggests it is not safe in low-income countries. Melatonin is a promising neuroprotective treatment in NE as it provides anti-inflammatory properties. Pre-clinical models have demonstrated improved outcomes with melatonin. However, its effect on human newborns is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects and safety of melatonin treatment compared to standard care, with or without therapeutic hypothermia, on survival and neurological sequelae in newborns with neonatal encephalopathy. SEARCH METHODS: We used CENTRAL, MEDLINE, two other databases, and two trial registers, together with reference checking and citation searching, to identify studies for inclusion in the review. The latest search date was 18 August 2025. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials in newborns with NE comparing the use of melatonin and TH versus standard treatment (including TH), and also melatonin monotherapy versus standard treatment (with no TH). We excluded cross-over randomised trials and non-randomised cohort studies. We excluded studies that included preterm newborns born at less than 34 weeks gestational age (GA) or studies that included newborns with major congenital anomalies. OUTCOMES: The critical outcome for both comparisons was the combined outcome of mortality or NDD at ≥ 18 months of age. Our important outcomes included differences in mortality (up to one month), NDD (at ≥ 18 months), abnormalities on a brain MRI (at one month), multiorgan dysfunction (up to one month), and use of anti-seizure medications (up to one month). RISK OF BIAS: We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 1) to assess bias in the included studies. SYNTHESIS METHODS: We synthesised results for each outcome using meta-analysis by calculating odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Where this was not possible due to the nature of the data, we summarised the results narratively. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for prespecified outcomes. We examined the effects of melatonin treatment and TH versus standard care (with TH) and the effects of melatonin monotherapy versus standard care (without TH). INCLUDED STUDIES: We included four studies including 155 participants. Sample sizes ranged from 20 to 80 participants per study. The mean age of participants ranged from 36.8 to 39.5 weeks' GA at birth. The proportion of males in the studies ranged from 54% to 76%. The proportion of participants with severe NE ranged from 20% to 59%. Follow-up periods ranged from time of discharge to 18 months of life. SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS: We identified four randomised controlled trials (155 participants). Two studies compared melatonin and TH versus standard treatment (with TH) (55 participants), and two studies compared melatonin monotherapy versus standard treatment (without TH) (100 participants). The studies recruited participants born at term or late preterm with NE. We judged the studies to have an overall low risk of bias. Composite outcome of mortality or neurodevelopmental disability (NDD), assessed at 18 months of age or over One study reported this outcome, and compared melatonin and TH to standard care (with TH). It was a pilot study with an insufficient sample size. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of melatonin on death of newborns with NE or neurodevelopmental disability in newborns who survived (1 study, 25 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Mortality in the first month after birth The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of melatonin and TH compared to standard care (with TH) on reduction in mortality (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.06 to 2.37; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 55 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of melatonin monotherapy compared to standard care (without TH) on reduction in mortality (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.69; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 100 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Incidence of neurodevelopmental disability, assessed at 18 months of age or over One included study reported this outcome, and compared melatonin and TH to standard treatment (with TH). It was a pilot study with an insufficient sample size. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of melatonin on reduction in neurodevelopmental disability (1 study, 25 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Abnormalities on brain MRI in the first month after birth: basal ganglia and thalamus Two included studies reported this outcome. Both studies compared melatonin and TH to standard care (with TH). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of melatonin on MRI abnormalities in the basal ganglia and thalamus (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.29 to 2.81; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 50 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Abnormalities on brain MRI in the first month after birth: white matter Two included studies reported this outcome. Both studies compared melatonin and TH to standard care (with TH). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of melatonin on MRI abnormalities in the white matter (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.02 to 6.04; I² = 64%; 2 studies, 50 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Multiorgan dysfunction or the use of anti-seizure medications in the first month after birth No study reported these outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The available data are of very low certainty, so we cannot draw conclusions about the effects of melatonin treatment on outcomes in newborns with neonatal encephalopathy. Only one pilot study of 25 participants reported our critical outcome. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of melatonin on death of newborns with neonatal encephalopathy or neurodevelopmental disability in the newborns who survive. We are uncertain about the effect of melatonin on mortality in the first month of life and on the incidence of abnormalities in magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Overall, the evidence to date for melatonin treatment in neonatal encephalopathy is uncertain, and larger randomised trials are urgently required. FUNDING: This research was conducted as part of the NEPTuNE Collaboration, funded by the Health Research Board of Ireland. REGISTRATION: Protocol available via DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD013754.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.