Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Speech Perception Scores Lower in Children With Speech Sound DisordersChildren with Speech Sound Disorders Struggle with Speech Perception

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider assessing speech perception in children with SSD, given lower scores versus TD peers.

This meta-analysis examined speech perception abilities in children with speech sound disorders (SSD) compared with typically developing (TD) children. The scope focused on speech perception tasks, specifically forced-choice identification, with secondary outcomes including discrimination, judgment, and neurophysiological paradigms. The analysis included 277 children (SSD n=140, TD n=137).

The main finding was that children with SSD had significantly lower speech perception scores than TD children, with a large effect size (Hedges's g = 0.84, p <.001). This indicates a robust association between SSD and poorer performance on speech perception tasks.

The authors highlight the clinical importance of assessing perceptual skills when diagnosing SSDs. However, limitations, funding, and conflicts of interest were not reported, and the study setting and follow-up were not described. No safety data were available.

Given the cross-sectional nature of the included data, causality cannot be inferred. Clinicians may consider incorporating speech perception assessment into diagnostic evaluations for SSD, while recognizing the need for further research to clarify directionality and clinical implications.

Researchers looked at how children with speech sound disorders (SSD) perform on speech perception tasks. They compared 140 children with SSD to 137 typically developing children. The study focused on how well children could identify and distinguish different sounds in speech.

The results showed that children with SSD had significantly lower scores in speech perception than their typically developing peers. This finding suggests that the difficulty in producing clear speech may be linked to how these children perceive sounds. The study also looked at discrimination and judgment, which are key parts of understanding spoken language.

Because this was a meta-analysis, it combines data from multiple sources to show a clear pattern. While the results highlight the importance of checking a child's listening skills during diagnosis, the study does not provide specific treatment plans. Parents and clinicians can use this information to better understand the challenges children with speech sound disorders face when processing sounds.

What this means for you:
Children with speech sound disorders often show lower scores in identifying and perceiving speech sounds.

Common questions

What did the study find about children with speech sound disorders?

The study found that children with speech sound disorders had significantly lower scores in speech perception tasks compared to typically developing children. The results showed a clear difference in how these children identify and understand sounds, which is important for diagnosing and treating speech issues.

How many children were included in this research?

The study included a total of 277 children. This group consisted of 140 children with speech sound disorders and 137 typically developing children. These numbers were used to compare how each group performed on speech perception tasks.

Why is speech perception important for children with speech issues?

The findings highlight the clinical importance of assessing a child's perception skills when they are diagnosed with speech sound disorders. Understanding how a child hears and identifies sounds helps specialists better understand the underlying challenges the child faces with speech.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 277
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the evidence on speech perception abilities of children with speech sound disorders (SSDs) to understand how the perceptual skills contribute to the diagnosis and characterization of SSDs. METHOD: We conducted a systematic and meta-analysis by searching four electronic databases for studies published between 2017 and 2025 that examined the speech perception skills of children with SSDs. We qualitatively evaluated the included studies based on study characteristics and methodological quality and performed a meta-analysis for the eligible homogeneous studies. RESULTS: Forty-nine papers met the inclusion criteria for the qualitative synthesis. Half of the studies featured identification tasks, while the other half featured discrimination, judgment, or neurophysiological paradigms. Methodological quality ranged from 74% to 96%. Seven homogeneous studies that used the forced-choice identification task were included for the meta-analysis. The pooled effect size based on 277 participants (SSD: = 140, typically developing [TD]: = 137) was statistically significant (Hedges's = 0.84, < .001), indicating that the speech perception scores of children with SSDs are lower than those of TD children. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that children with SSDs show measurable deficits in speech perception, underscoring the clinical importance of assessing perceptual skills when diagnosing SSDs. Identification tasks currently provide the most consistent evidence, while emerging neurophysiological methods expand insight into underlying processing mechanisms. Recommendations for future research include examining perception in more natural listening conditions, such as speech perception in noise, and testing whether perceptual interventions can improve speech outcomes. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.33246702.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.