Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Infants with KCNJ11 c.497G>A variant and iDEND syndrome show persistent non-responsiveness to sulfonylurea therapyTwo infants with rare diabetes don't respond to common drug

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that infants with the KCNJ11 c.497G>A variant may show persistent non-responsiveness to sulfonylurea therapy.

This narrative review and case report describes the clinical management of infants diagnosed with iDEND syndrome and specific genetic mutations. The scope of the report focuses on the therapeutic response of patients carrying the KCNJ11 c.497G>A (p.Cys166Tyr) variant to standard treatments.

The authors report that 2 out of 2 patients with the KCNJ11 c.497G>A variant showed persistent non-responsiveness to sulfonylurea therapy, specifically glibenclamide. These patients were managed with insulin therapy, including CSII and multiple daily injections. The report highlights the association between the KCNJ11 c.497G>A variant and iDEND syndrome.

A primary limitation of this evidence is the small sample size of 2 patients. The findings are based on a case report and narrative review rather than a large-scale clinical trial. These results provide specific guidance for the management of iDEND patients with this specific genetic variant, but the generalizability is limited by the small cohort.

How this fits prior evidence

This report addresses a gap in the management of specific genetic variants in neonatal diabetes. While prior coverage noted that insulin is linked to higher mortality in cancer patients, this report focuses on the specific lack of response to sulfonylureas in infants with the KCNJ11 c.497G>A variant. It provides specific clinical context for iDEND syndrome patients that is not addressed in the existing coverage of general antidiabetic medications or automated insulin delivery systems.

Imagine your baby has diabetes that shows up in the first months of life. Doctors often try a drug called glibenclamide instead of insulin shots. But for two infants with a rare condition called iDEND syndrome and a specific change in the KCNJ11 gene, that drug didn't work.

The report describes two babies with this exact gene variant, called c.497G>A (p.Cys166Tyr). Both were treated with glibenclamide and both stayed unresponsive. The report doesn't say how long they were followed or what other treatments they received.

This is a case report, not a full study. With only two patients, we can't know if all babies with this variant will fail the drug. But it's a warning: for this particular mutation, glibenclamide may not be the answer.

The report doesn't mention side effects or funding. It does say the finding gives guidance for managing iDEND patients with this variant. If your child has this condition, talk to their doctor about what this means for their care.

What this means for you:
Two infants with a specific KCNJ11 mutation and iDEND syndrome did not respond to glibenclamide.

Common questions

What is iDEND syndrome?

iDEND stands for intermediate developmental delay, epilepsy, and neonatal diabetes. It's a rare condition caused by changes in the KCNJ11 gene. Babies with iDEND have diabetes that starts in the first six months of life, along with developmental delay and epilepsy. The report describes two infants with this syndrome and a specific KCNJ11 variant.

Why didn't glibenclamide work for these infants?

The report doesn't explain why. It only says that both infants had the same KCNJ11 c.497G>A (p.Cys166Tyr) variant and both were persistently unresponsive to glibenclamide. The study authors suggest this finding provides guidance for managing iDEND patients with this variant, but they don't offer a reason for the lack of response.

Is glibenclamide safe for infants with KCNJ11 mutations?

The report doesn't provide safety information. It doesn't mention adverse events, serious side effects, or discontinuations. Because this is a case report with only two patients, safety data are limited. Parents should discuss any treatment decisions with their child's doctor.

How many patients were in this report?

The report includes two infants. Both had iDEND syndrome and the KCNJ11 c.497G>A variant. Both were treated with glibenclamide and both did not respond. The small number means the findings may not apply to everyone with this condition.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedNov 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM) is a rare monogenic form of diabetes that predominantly manifests within the first six months of life. This report presents two patients with mutations in the potassium inwardly rectifying channel subfamily J member 11 (KCNJ11) gene, accompanied by a narrative literature review. Both infants exhibited severe diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and growth retardation, without seizures. Following ketoacidosis resolution, Patient 1 required continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), while Patient 2 received hospital-based point-of-care testing-guided multiple daily insulin injections supplemented with glibenclamide. However, both cases exhibited persistent non-responsiveness to sulfonylurea therapy. Genetic testing revealed a heterozygous KCNJ11 c.497G > A (p.Cys166Tyr) variant in both infants. Based on their clinical manifestations, both patients were diagnosed with iDEND. This paper presents a comprehensive account of the clinical features, varied insulin delivery methods, and glucose monitoring strategies in two patients with iDEND harboring the KCNJ11 c.497G > A variant. This finding expands the known clinical spectrum associated with this specific variant and provides critical evidence-based guidance for the therapeutic management.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.