Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Non-pharmacological de-escalation techniques used in Australian EDs for children with acute severe behavioural disturbanceWhy Calming Kids in the ER Often Isn’t Enough

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider that verbal de-escalation and active listening were commonly used in EDs for children with acute severe behavioural disturbance, but effectiveness was not assessed.

This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial conducted across nine emergency departments in Australia between October 2021 and November 2023. The population was 348 enrolled children aged 9-17 years with acute severe behavioural disturbance, with data recorded for 337. The primary analysis described the frequency and nature of non-pharmacological de-escalation techniques used.

The comparator was not reported, as this was a secondary analysis of a trial comparing oral olanzapine vs oral diazepam. The main results showed that verbal de-escalation was the most commonly attempted technique, used in 96% of participants. Active listening was the second most common, used in 75% of participants. Variation in techniques across the nine participating sites was similar, with no significant variation reported.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported for the de-escalation techniques. Key limitations include that this was a secondary analysis of a trial not primarily designed to assess de-escalation techniques, information was recorded for only 97% of participants, and no data on effectiveness or order of use were available.

Practice relevance highlights the variety of non-pharmacological strategies used in EDs for this population. However, results are descriptive with no statistical comparisons, and causal claims about effectiveness are not supported.

  • Staff try talking first, but medicine often follows.
  • Helps children and teens with severe behavior issues.
  • Methods are common, but not always enough alone.

ER staff almost always try talking first, but severe cases still need medicine.

Imagine a parent watching their child scream in a busy hospital. They want help, but the room is loud. The air feels heavy with worry and fear.

Why families fear medicine

Parents often worry about giving drugs to their children. They want to avoid side effects or long-term risks. It is natural to hope for a gentler solution first.

But severe behavior issues can feel overwhelming for everyone involved. The child is in pain, and the parents feel helpless.

The calm-down steps taken

Doctors and nurses try to lower the stress before using pills. They use non-drug methods to help the child feel safe. This is called de-escalation, or calming down techniques.

Most staff start by talking to the child calmly. They try to listen to what the child needs.

New research shows these steps happen almost every time. In a recent study, 96 percent of kids got verbal help first.

The hard truth about meds

Despite these efforts, the children still needed medicine to settle down. All participants in this group required oral sedatives eventually.

This might seem like the calming methods failed. But it shows how severe the situation was.

Think of a car engine overheating. You might try to cool it with water. If the heat is too high, you need more than just water.

This doesn’t mean these methods are useless.

They are the first line of defense. They buy time and reduce harm before stronger tools are needed.

How to pick the right tool

We need to know which calming steps work best. Some techniques might help more than others in specific situations.

Doctors need to know the order of use for these methods. This helps them act faster when a child is in crisis.

The study looked at children aged 9 to 17 years. It covered nine emergency departments across Australia.

What this means for your child

Families should know that talking is the standard first step. It is not skipped even when medicine is needed later.

You should talk to your doctor about your concerns. They can explain why a specific treatment is chosen for your child.

There is no need to panic if medicine is used. It is often the safest way to stop a crisis quickly.

Why we need more data

This research had some limits that we must understand. It looked at a specific group of children who already needed drugs.

We do not know if the methods work for milder cases. The study was a secondary analysis of a larger trial.

The road ahead

More studies are needed to find the best first steps. Scientists want to test which calming methods work best.

Approval for new treatments takes time and careful testing. We must ensure safety before changing how care is given.

Future research will focus on finding the right order of use. This could help families avoid severe situations sooner.

The goal is to make emergency care kinder and safer. We are learning how to support children and parents better.

Every small step in research brings us closer to better outcomes. Trust the process and keep asking questions.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 348
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up204.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency and nature of non-pharmacological de-escalation methods used for children and adolescents presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with acute severe behavioural disturbance (ASBD). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre trial of oral olanzapine versus oral diazepam for the management of ASBD. SETTING: Nine EDs in Australia between October 2021 and November 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 9-17 years, for whom information on non-pharmacological de-escalation attempts was recorded, who ultimately required oral sedative medication to manage their ASBD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The frequency and nature of the use of non-pharmacological de-escalation methods for children and adolescents presenting to EDs in a state of ASBD. RESULTS: There were 348 participants enrolled in the randomised controlled trial. This study reports on the 337 of 348 participants (97%) for whom information was recorded regarding non-pharmacological de-escalation attempts during the trial period. Verbal de-escalation was the most commonly attempted technique (96%) followed by active listening (75%). The frequency and nature of de-escalation techniques used were similar across the nine participating sites. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of non-pharmacological de-escalation strategies are used among patients who require oral sedative medication. There is a need for studies to investigate whether there are optimal first-line de-escalation strategies and to determine their effectiveness and order of use in children and adolescents presenting to EDs with ASBD.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.