Laparoscopic vs open inguinal hernia repair in children: cohort study reports differences in outcomes
This was a retrospective cohort study of 9590 children undergoing inguinal hernia repair at a tertiary pediatric center. The study compared outcomes for laparoscopic versus open repair. Incarceration occurred in 4.2% of children, with a higher risk in females, children ≤1 year, and unilateral hernias. Recurrence occurred in 1.4% of children, with a higher risk in male sex and age >1 year; laparoscopic technique served as a protective factor. Laparoscopic surgery identified synchronous contralateral hernias in 39.2% of children initially diagnosed with unilateral hernia, compared with only 0.9% detected during open repair. The laparoscopic approach was associated with shorter operative time, fewer complications, and faster recovery. Safety data, including adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability, were not reported. Key limitations include the retrospective design, non-randomized selection of surgical approach, and caution in interpreting comparisons between techniques. Findings emphasize individualized risk stratification and surgical decision-making, but generalizability beyond the tertiary center and long-term outcomes are uncertain.