Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Clinical decision support tool improves pediatric hypertension recognition in rural clinics

Clinical decision support tool improves pediatric hypertension recognition in rural clinics
Photo by Mufid Majnun / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
High-intensity clinical decision support significantly improves pediatric hypertension remeasurement and recognition in rural clinics compared to usual care.

This randomized controlled trial evaluated a clinical decision support (CDS) tool for pediatric hypertension within a primarily rural health system comprising 40 primary care clinics. The study enrolled 9,155 patients aged 6-17 years with elevated blood pressure measured during a primary care visit between August 1, 2022, and January 31, 2024. The intervention compared high-intensity implementation (in-person and online training, monthly check-ins, and feedback) versus low-intensity implementation (online training only) against usual care.

The primary outcome was the remeasurement of elevated blood pressure during a visit and recognition of hypertension within six months of meeting diagnostic criteria. For remeasurement, the high-intensity CDS group achieved 51.5%, the low-intensity group 23.6%, and usual care clinics 6.2%. The adjusted odds ratio for high/low-intensity versus usual care was 8.70 (95% CI 5.68-13.3), and for high-intensity versus low-intensity, it was 3.45 (95% CI 1.88-6.33).

For hypertension recognition within six months, rates were 42.8% in the high-intensity group, 24.5% in the low-intensity group, and 14.4% in usual care. The adjusted odds ratio for high/low-intensity versus usual care was 2.94 (95% CI 1.00-8.60), and for high-intensity versus low-intensity, it was 2.31 (95% CI 1.08-4.98). These results indicate that CDS tools, particularly with high-intensity implementation, substantially improve pediatric hypertension care processes in rural settings.

Safety data were not reported, including adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, or tolerability. The study did not assess long-term clinical outcomes such as cardiovascular events. The cluster randomized design may introduce bias, and follow-up duration for outcomes was not clearly defined. The findings are limited to a rural health system and may not generalize to urban settings.

The practice relevance is significant: CDS tools can enhance pediatric BP care in rural clinics, with effectiveness varying by implementation intensity. As an randomized controlled trial, causality can be inferred for the intervention effects. Results are based on adjusted analyses with confidence intervals, but certainty is moderate due to the cluster design and limited follow-up details.

Clinicians should consider implementing high-intensity CDS strategies to improve hypertension recognition in pediatric patients. However, they should not infer that CDS reduces long-term hypertension complications or generalize findings to non-rural settings without further evidence. The study underscores the importance of implementation approach in achieving clinical improvements.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 9,155
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up204.0 mo
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVES: Elevated blood pressure (BP) and hypertension are often overlooked in pediatric care. We adapted a pediatric hypertension clinical decision support (CDS) for a primarily rural health system and compared CDS impact across varied implementation approaches. METHODS: In this cluster randomized trial, 40 primary care clinics were randomized 1:1:1 to CDS with high-intensity implementation, CDS with low-intensity implementation, or usual care (UC). Low-intensity implementation was limited to online training. High-intensity CDS implementation included in-person and online training, monthly check-ins and feedback regarding CDS use. Patients 6-17 years with BP measured at a primary care visit from August 1, 2022 to January 31, 2024 were eligible. Outcomes were remeasurement of elevated BP during a visit and recognition of hypertension within 6 months of meeting criteria. Analyses adjusted for clustered study design and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Of 9155 patients with an elevated BP, remeasurement during the visit occurred for 51.5% at high-intensity, 23.6% at low-intensity, and 6.2% at UC clinics. Among 578 patients with incident hypertension, recognition was 42.8% at high-intensity, 24.5% at low-intensity and 14.4% at UC clinics. Patients attending high or low-intensity CDS clinics were more likely than those at UC to have elevated BP remeasured (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.70; 95% CI 5.68-13.3) and to have their hypertension clinically recognized (aOR 2.94; 1.00-8.60). High-intensity implementation was more effective than low-intensity implementation for repeat BP measurement (aOR 3.45; 1.88-6.33) and hypertension recognition (aOR 2.31; 1.08-4.98). CONCLUSIONS: CDS improved pediatric BP care in a primarily rural health system while effectiveness varied by implementation approach.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.