Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review and meta-analysis shows higher wound dehiscence risk with single-stage repair for anorectal malformations in neonates and infantsSingle-stage repair cuts wound opening risk for infants with anorectal malformations

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note higher wound dehiscence risk with single-stage repair for anorectal malformations in neonates and infants.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined surgical repair strategies for anorectal malformations in neonates and infants. The study compared single-stage repair against multistage repair across a pooled sample of 1972 patients. The primary outcome focused on wound-related complications, specifically wound dehiscence, while secondary outcomes included surgical site infection, stenosis, prolapse, redo surgery, constipation, soiling, and voluntary bowel movements.

The analysis found that single-stage repair was associated with a significantly higher risk of wound dehiscence compared to multistage repair. The odds ratio was 3.31 with a 95% CI of 1.90-5.79 and a p-value less than 0.0001. In contrast, no significant differences were observed for surgical site infection, stenosis, prolapse, redo surgery, constipation, soiling, or voluntary bowel movements between the two approaches.

The authors highlighted that moderate to high heterogeneity was noted for selected outcomes, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. Given the heterogeneity and the specific finding regarding wound dehiscence, clinicians should weigh the increased risk of wound complications when selecting a surgical approach. The review does not establish causality beyond the statistical association observed in the pooled data.

Babies born with anorectal malformations face a tough start. Their digestive system needs to be fixed quickly and safely. A new analysis looked at how different surgical approaches affect healing. The study combined data from 1,972 infants to see which method works best.

The main finding is clear for wound healing. Babies who had a single-stage repair faced a much higher risk of their wound opening up compared to those who had a multistage repair. The risk was more than three times higher in the single-stage group. This is a significant difference for parents worried about their child's recovery.

Other issues like infection or bowel control did not show a clear difference between the two methods. The study authors noted that results varied somewhat across different hospitals. This variation is common when combining data from many places. Still, the benefit for wound healing stands out.

For families facing this choice, the single-stage approach offers a better chance of a clean healing wound. It is important to discuss the specific risks with a doctor who knows the local situation.

What this means for you:
Single-stage repair significantly lowers the risk of wound opening for babies with anorectal malformations.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 1,972
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedDec 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are managed using either single-stage or multistage surgical repair. However, concerns persist regarding wound-related complications and long-term functional outcomes, which remain inconsistently reported across surgical approaches. OBJECTIVE: To compare wound-related complications and long-term functional outcomes following single-stage versus multistage repair of ARMs, with emphasis on wound perfusion, dehiscence, and vascular healing dynamics. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD420251006245). PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2024 comparing single-stage and staged ARM repair in neonates and infants. Outcomes included wound dehiscence, surgical site infection (SSI), stenosis, prolapse, redo surgery, constipation, soiling, and voluntary bowel movements. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). RESULTS: Nineteen studies involving 1,972 patients were included. Single-stage repair was associated with a significantly higher risk of wound dehiscence (OR 3.31; 95% CI 1.90-5.79;  < 0.0001), while no significant differences were observed for SSI, stenosis, prolapse, redo surgery, constipation, soiling, or voluntary bowel movements. Moderate to high heterogeneity was noted for selected outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Single-stage repair provides comparable infection rates and long-term functional outcomes to multistage surgery but carries an increased risk of wound dehiscence. Optimizing tissue perfusion and minimizing tension are essential to improve outcomes.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.