Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

HGNS therapy improves subjective outcomes but shows limited cognitive benefit in OSA patients

HGNS therapy improves subjective outcomes but shows limited cognitive benefit in OSA patients
Photo by Brett Jordan / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that HGNS improves subjective outcomes but cognitive benefits appear limited to specific patient subsets.

This secondary analysis of a randomized crossover trial examined 60 patients with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea who were already optimized on hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy. The study compared active HGNS therapy against control (partially therapeutic) HGNS therapy over two 4-week treatment periods, with a subset of 43 patients undergoing cognitive testing. The primary focus was on cognitive measures including psychomotor vigilance test and digit symbol substitution test, along with several patient-reported outcomes.

Results showed no differences in cognitive performance measures between active and control HGNS therapy in the overall population. However, in a per-protocol analysis limited to patients with at least 50% AHI reduction, DSST reaction time improved with active HGNS by a mean change of -153.6 ms (95% CI [-285.3, -22.0] ms; p=0.025). All patient-reported outcomes, including Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Insomnia Severity Index, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, and Snoring Visual Analog Scale, showed significant improvements with active HGNS therapy.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported in this analysis. Key limitations include the subset analysis for cognitive improvement findings and the need for additional investigation into the relationship between subjective and objective outcomes. The study's practice relevance is restrained by its secondary analysis nature, short 2.3-month follow-up, and the fact that cognitive improvement was only observed in a specific subset of patients. The findings suggest that while patients report subjective benefits from optimized HGNS therapy, objective cognitive measures may not show consistent improvement across the broader OSA population.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up2.3 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: The effect of therapeutic versus partially therapeutic levels of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) therapy on cognitive measures and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) was evaluated in patients with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: In a 10-week, double-blind, randomized crossover therapy trial, subjects optimized on HGNS therapy underwent 4 weeks each of active and control (partially therapeutic) HGNS therapy. Cognitive measures (psychomotor vigilance test [PVT], digit symbol substitution test [DSST]) and sleep-related PROs were assessed after each 4-week treatment period. RESULTS: Sixty subjects were randomized and completed the primary study protocol, including PROs. A subset of randomized subjects (n = 43) underwent cognitive testing. This subset was, on average, older (65.7 ± 10.2 years), overweight/obese (body mass index [BMI] 29.7 ± 4.6 kg/m), and had severe OSA at baseline (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 34.2 ± 15.0 events/h). There were no differences in cognitive performance measures between active and control (partially therapeutic) HGNS conditions in all subjects; in the per-protocol analysis, however, improvement in DSST reaction time with active HGNS was demonstrated (mean [95% CI] change on active therapy = - 153.6 [- 285.3, - 22.0] ms; p = 0.025). Significant improvements in all PROs (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Insomnia Severity Index, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, and Snoring Visual Analog Scale) were observed in the active HGNS condition. CONCLUSIONS: In this secondary analysis of the CARDIOSA-12 randomized crossover trial of subjects using HGNS, subjective PROs, but not objective cognitive measures, were improved with active HGNS compared to control (partially therapeutic) HGNS therapy. These findings warrant additional investigation examining the relationship between subjective and objective neurocognitive outcomes in OSA. The effect of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS), a novel and promising therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), on neurocognitive deficits remains underexplored. This study evaluated whether HGNS therapy improves cognitive performance using the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) and digit symbol substitution test (DSST), along with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) related to sleepiness, snoring, insomnia, and sleep-related function. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, no significant differences in PVT or DSST outcomes were observed between active and control (partially therapeutic) HGNS therapy; however, in a subset of participants with ≥ 50% reduction in AHI with active HGNS, improvement in DSST reaction time was noted. All PROs significantly improved with active HGNS, suggesting benefits in subjective measures without substantial changes in objective cognitive measures.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.