This randomised controlled trial enrolled 150 sedentary adults aged 40-60 with at least one cardiovascular risk factor in Lahore, Pakistan from January to June 2025. Participants were assigned to chronotype-aligned exercise (CAE), exercising at their preferred time, or chronotype-misaligned exercise (CME), exercising at their non-preferred time, over 12 weeks, with 134 completing the study (64 in CAE, 70 in CME). The primary outcomes were systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) and heart rate variability (RMSSD), with secondary outcomes including peak oxygen consumption (VO₂ peak), low density lipoprotein (LDL), fasting glucose, and sleep quality (PSQI).
Main results showed CAE led to significantly greater improvements than CME across all measured outcomes. For systolic BP, CAE reduced it by 10.8 mm Hg compared to 5.5 mm Hg for CME (p=0.002, η²=0.095). For diastolic BP, RMSSD, VO₂ peak, LDL, fasting glucose, and PSQI scores, CAE also showed significantly greater improvements, though exact numbers, effect sizes, and p-values were not reported for these outcomes.
Safety and tolerability were not reported, including adverse events, serious adverse events, or discontinuations. Limitations include the single-center setting in Pakistan, which may limit generalizability, and lack of reported safety data. Funding and conflicts of interest were not reported. Practice relevance suggests chronotype-based exercise prescriptions could be a cost-effective, personalised approach to improving cardiovascular health, but this is based on a short-term trial with incomplete safety information.
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether aligning exercise timing with chronotype enhances cardiometabolic and sleep-related benefits in sedentary adults with cardiovascular risk factors.
METHODS: In this 12-week randomised controlled trial conducted in Lahore, Pakistan (January-June 2025), 150 sedentary adults (aged 40-60) with at least one cardiovascular risk factor were recruited and categorised as morning-type or evening-type using the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire and validated by 48 hour core body temperature monitoring. Participants were randomised into a chronotype-aligned exercise (CAE) group exercising at their preferred time, or a chronotype-misaligned exercise (CME) group exercising at their non-preferred time. Moderate-intensity aerobic training (5 sessions/week, 40 min/session) was supervised. Primary outcomes included systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) and heart rate variability (RMSSD); secondary outcomes included peak oxygen consumption (VO₂ peak), low density lipoprotein (LDL), fasting glucose and sleep quality (PSQI), assessed pre- and post-intervention.
RESULTS: Of 150 randomised participants, 134 completed the study (CAE: n=64; CME: n=70). CAE led to significantly greater improvements in systolic BP (-10.8 vs -5.5 mm Hg, p=0.002), diastolic BP, RMSSD, VO₂ peak, LDL, fasting glucose and PSQI scores compared with CME. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant group×time interactions across all outcomes (eg, systolic BP: η²=0.095, p=0.005). The reduction in systolic BP in the CAE group was substantial and significantly greater than in the CME group.
CONCLUSION: Aligning exercise timing with individual chronotype significantly enhances cardiometabolic and sleep-related outcomes in at-risk adults. Chronotype-based exercise prescriptions may offer a cost-effective, personalised approach to improving cardiovascular health.