Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis finds nonsignificant effects for Kegel exercises on key UI outcomes in women

Meta-analysis finds nonsignificant effects for Kegel exercises on key UI outcomes in women
Photo by Ahmet Kurt / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Interpret meta-analysis on Kegel exercises for UI with caution; evidence for effects on key outcomes is limited.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effects of Kegel exercises in women with urinary incontinence. The analysis pooled data from 11 randomized controlled trials involving 819 women, comparing Kegel exercises against active or passive comparators. The primary outcome was not reported; secondary outcomes included the Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), a pad (PAD) test, and pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength.

For the ICIQ-SF, the standardized mean difference (SMD) was 0.106 (95% CI: -0.134 to 0.345, p = 0.387), indicating nonsignificant differences. The PAD test showed an SMD of -0.048 (95% CI: -0.466 to 0.370, p = 0.822), and PFM strength showed an SMD of 0.035 (95% CI: -0.508 to 0.579, p = 0.898), both also nonsignificant. The analysis notes that other outcomes revealed significant improvements, especially when Kegel exercises were combined with other treatments.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations of the evidence were not reported in the input. The funding sources and potential conflicts of interest were also not reported. In practice, this meta-analysis provides an association from RCTs but does not establish conclusive evidence for Kegel exercises alone on these specific measures. The authors state the evidence for the effects of Kegel exercises on UI is limited and that further studies are warranted.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common health condition among women. Pelvic floor muscle training is used to increase pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength. OBJECTIVES: This review aims to explore the effects of Kegel exercises on women with UI. METHODS: "PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CINAHL" were searched from inception to October 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) administering Kegel exercises to women with UI, compared with active or passive comparators, and consisting of at least one outcome measure assessing UI were selected. The "Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool" was used to evaluate the quality of the selected studies. RESULTS: Eleven studies (819 women) met eligibility criteria. The findings revealed nonsignificant differences in the Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.106, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.134 to 0.345, p = 0.387, I = 40%], the PAD test [SMD = -0.048, 95% CI: -0.466 to 0.370, p = 0.822, I = 75%], and the PFM strength [SMD = 0.035, 95% CI: -0.508 to 0.579, p = 0.898, I = 82%]. Other outcomes revealed significant improvements, especially when Kegel exercises were combined with other treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for the effects of Kegel exercises on UI is limited. Further studies are warranted to explore the effects of Kegel exercises on women with different health and medical characteristics.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.