Meta-analysis finds nonsignificant effects for Kegel exercises on key UI outcomes in women
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effects of Kegel exercises in women with urinary incontinence. The analysis pooled data from 11 randomized controlled trials involving 819 women, comparing Kegel exercises against active or passive comparators. The primary outcome was not reported; secondary outcomes included the Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), a pad (PAD) test, and pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength.
For the ICIQ-SF, the standardized mean difference (SMD) was 0.106 (95% CI: -0.134 to 0.345, p = 0.387), indicating nonsignificant differences. The PAD test showed an SMD of -0.048 (95% CI: -0.466 to 0.370, p = 0.822), and PFM strength showed an SMD of 0.035 (95% CI: -0.508 to 0.579, p = 0.898), both also nonsignificant. The analysis notes that other outcomes revealed significant improvements, especially when Kegel exercises were combined with other treatments.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations of the evidence were not reported in the input. The funding sources and potential conflicts of interest were also not reported. In practice, this meta-analysis provides an association from RCTs but does not establish conclusive evidence for Kegel exercises alone on these specific measures. The authors state the evidence for the effects of Kegel exercises on UI is limited and that further studies are warranted.